Learn Before
  • Source Study: Falk & Heckman (2009) on Lab Experiments

A common critique of laboratory experiments in the social sciences is that their artificial settings and use of specific participant pools (like university students) limit the generalizability of their findings to real-world populations and situations. Based on the arguments presented in the influential 2009 Science article on this topic, which of the following statements provides the most robust defense against this specific criticism?

0

1

a month ago

Contributors are:

Who are from:

Tags

Library Science

Economics

Economy

Social Science

Empirical Science

Science

CORE Econ

Introduction to Microeconomics Course

Evaluation in Bloom's Taxonomy

Cognitive Psychology

Psychology

Related
  • Armin Falk

  • James Heckman

  • Evaluating the Role of Laboratory Experiments in Social Science

  • A central argument in the 2009 Science article on the role of laboratory experiments is that they are a major source of knowledge for the social sciences. Which of the following best analyzes the fundamental reason for this claim?

  • A central tenet of the argument that laboratory experiments are a major source of knowledge in the social sciences is that their primary value comes from their ability to perfectly replicate complex, real-world situations in a controlled setting.

  • Falk & Heckman (2009) on Lab Experiments

  • Applying Principles of Experimental Design

  • A 2009 article in the journal Science argued that laboratory experiments are a major source of knowledge in the social sciences. Match each key methodological concept from the debate surrounding lab experiments with its correct description.

  • According to a prominent 2009 article on the value of laboratory experiments in the social sciences, a key advantage of this method is its ability to isolate and establish clear ______ relationships between variables, a task often complicated by confounding factors in real-world observational data.

  • A common critique of laboratory experiments in the social sciences is that their artificial settings and use of specific participant pools (like university students) limit the generalizability of their findings to real-world populations and situations. Based on the arguments presented in the influential 2009 Science article on this topic, which of the following statements provides the most robust defense against this specific criticism?

  • A social scientist aims to determine whether cooperative behavior is driven more by an innate preference for fairness or by the fear of punishment from others. To achieve this, they need to cleanly separate these two potential motivations. Based on the core arguments presented in the influential 2009 Science article about the role of different research methods, which of the following approaches would be most suitable for this specific research question?

  • A researcher is investigating the 'warm-glow' effect, the idea that people donate to charity partly for the personal satisfaction it brings, separate from any concern for the recipient. They want to isolate this internal motivation from external factors like social pressure or tax incentives. According to the core arguments presented in the influential 2009 Science article on the value of different research methods, which of the following research designs would be most effective for this specific goal, and why?