Split-Bus and Main-Lug Panel Evaluation for Replacement

A contractor inspects a home and finds a Federal Pacific Stab-Lok panel that is functioning and already provides enough amperage for the homeowner's current electrical loads. What is the correct course of action?

When quoting a job to remove a recalled Federal Pacific Stab-Lok panel and install a safe, modern panel of the exact same amperage, the contractor must always scope the project as a full service upgrade that includes replacing the existing meter base and utility connection.

As an electrical contractor, you must correctly scope projects based on the condition of the existing electrical equipment. Match each field scenario with the most appropriate proposed scope of work.

A contractor is inspecting a home and discovers a 150-amp Federal Pacific Stab-Lok panel. The home's electrical load calculations show a maximum demand of 120 amps, and the exterior meter base and service entrance conductors meet all current codes. Arrange the following analytical steps and scoping decisions in the correct logical order to appropriately resolve this situation.

You are reviewing a junior estimator's proposal for a home with an adequate 200-amp service but a known hazardous Zinsco interior panel. The junior estimator included costs for a new meter base and service entrance conductors. Evaluating this proposal against industry best practices, you determine these exterior costs are unjustified because the equipment meets current code. To correctly align the scope of work with the necessary safety intervention without overcharging the client, you must reclassify the project from a full service upgrade to a panel ____.