Learn Before
  • Simplifying the Feasible Set Constraint to an Equality

A firm's objective is to maximize profit, calculated as total revenue minus total wage costs. The firm is subject to a rule that the wage it pays, w, must be greater than or equal to a minimum level that depends on the number of employees, N. This relationship is expressed as w ≥ W(N). Since paying any wage higher than the absolute minimum required for a given N would unnecessarily increase costs and thus reduce profit, the firm's profit-maximization calculation can be simplified by treating this constraint as a strict ________.

0

1

a month ago

Contributors are:

Who are from:

Tags

Science

Economy

CORE Econ

Social Science

Empirical Science

Economics

Introduction to Microeconomics Course

The Economy 2.0 Microeconomics @ CORE Econ

Related
  • Profit Maximization as Tangency Between an Isoprofit Curve and the No-Shirking Wage Curve

  • Expressing Profit as a Function of Employment Only via Substitution

  • A profit-maximizing firm determines that to ensure its employees work effectively, the wage (ww) it pays must be greater than or equal to a specific value that depends on the number of employees (NN). This relationship is described by the constraint wW(N)w \ge W(N), where W(N)W(N) is the minimum wage required for any given level of employment. When choosing its wage and employment level to maximize profit, which of the following statements best describes the firm's optimal wage-setting strategy?

  • A profit-maximizing firm faces a constraint where the wage (ww) it pays must be greater than or equal to a specific minimum level, W(N)W(N), which depends on the number of employees (NN). The firm will find it optimal to pay a wage strictly greater than W(N)W(N) if it believes the extra pay will significantly boost employee morale.

  • Rationale for Simplifying the Wage Constraint

  • Evaluating Competing Wage Strategies

  • Critique of a Suboptimal Wage-Setting Strategy

  • A firm's wage-setting is constrained by the condition wW(N)w \ge W(N), where ww is the wage and W(N)W(N) is the minimum required wage for a given employment level NN. Match each of the following firm scenarios to the most logical wage-setting outcome that results from its objective.

  • A firm's objective is to maximize profit, calculated as total revenue minus total wage costs. The firm is subject to a rule that the wage it pays, w, must be greater than or equal to a minimum level that depends on the number of employees, N. This relationship is expressed as w ≥ W(N). Since paying any wage higher than the absolute minimum required for a given N would unnecessarily increase costs and thus reduce profit, the firm's profit-maximization calculation can be simplified by treating this constraint as a strict ________.

  • A firm seeks to maximize its profits. It understands that the wage (ww) it pays must be at least as high as a certain minimum level, W(N)W(N), which is determined by the number of employees (NN). This gives the constraint wW(N)w \ge W(N). Arrange the following steps in the logical order that demonstrates how the firm would reason to simplify this constraint for its profit-maximization calculation.

  • Analyzing a Firm's Wage Decision

  • A firm operates under the constraint that its wage, w, must be at least as high as a minimum level, W(N), which is determined by the number of employees, N. The function W(N) represents the lowest possible wage the firm can pay to ensure its employees work effectively at a given employment level. The firm's goal is to maximize profit. For a specific employment level, N*, the firm calculates that W(N*) is $20 per hour. A manager proposes paying $22 per hour for this same employment level, N*. Based on the logic of cost minimization for a given output, what is the direct consequence of this proposal?