Learn Before
A Small Set of Mistakes Can Still Guide Priorities
If a dev set contains only 10 errors, that sample is too small to estimate how much each error type matters with much confidence. Even so, when labeled data is scarce, reviewing those few mistakes is still more useful than ignoring them because it can help the team decide where to focus first.
0
1
Tags
Machine Learning
Deep Learning
Machine Learning Strategy
Supervised Learning
Dive into Deep Learning @ D2L
Data Science
Machine Learning Yearning @ DeepLearning.AI
Related
A Small Set of Mistakes Can Still Guide Priorities
A Small Sample of Dev Errors Can Reveal Major Failure Patterns
Reviewing About 50 Mistakes Reveals Main Error Sources
Reviewing About 100 Eyeball Dev Errors Usually Reveals the Main Failure Patterns
Lower Error Rates Require Larger Review Sets
Why should the manually reviewed dev subset be large enough?
The rough sizing guidance for an eyeball development set is meant for tasks that people can evaluate reliably.
A validation sample should be large enough to reveal the system's main _____.
Match each example count to the amount of insight it typically provides when reviewing errors by hand.
Order the steps for reviewing a validation set to find the most common model mistakes.
Which example task is used to illustrate a rough Eyeball dev set size recommendation?
A tiny validation sample is enough to uncover every major failure mode in a model.
When manual error review is practical
Match each concept to the best description in a model error-analysis setting.
Decide Whether a Human Review Set Is Large Enough
How should an Eyeball dev set be sized to reveal the main error patterns?
Choose the right size for a review set in an image recognition project.
Purpose of an Eyeball Dev Set for Human-Level Tasks
Learn After
Why is a small review set with only 10 mistakes too limited for judging where to focus improvement work?
A review of only ten dev-set errors can reliably estimate the impact of each error category.
With only ten observed mistakes, estimating the importance of each category is _____.
Match each small dev-set condition with the implication it supports.
Order the reasoning for working with only 12 review errors in a content-moderation dev set.
Explain why a tiny error sample is limited but still useful.
How should a team use a very small error-review set?
Why can a small set of manually inspected dev errors still be useful?
What should you do if a review of model mistakes turns up only 12 examples and no more labeled data can be collected?
Even when a dev subset is tiny, checking its errors can still help decide what to improve first.