Using "you lie down" versus "you have to lie down" matters. Active voice positions patient as choosing their actions. This makes accountability and responsibility relevant to the interaction. It opens possibility for different choices in future.

State University of New York at Binghamton

- Normalization Devices
- Hypothetical Treatment Directions
- Insufficient Explanation Framing
- Agency Attribution
- Hedging and Distancing

Practitioner Challenge Strategies: Techniques for encouraging behavioral change without direct confrontation

- Willing But Unable Identity
- Agency Attribution
- Agency-Accountability Link
- Mind-Body Contrast Management

Agency Management: How agency is attributed, resisted, and negotiated

Lester, J. N. (Ed.). (2021). Discursive Psychology and Disability. Palgrave Studies in Discursive Psychology. Springer Nature Switzerland AG.

Reference For: Discursive Psychology and Disability

Practitioners use "just" to minimize perceived difficulty. "Just go do it" suggests activity is ordinary and achievable. This implies patient could and should be able to perform the action. It challenges the self-evidence of disability claims.

Normalization Devices

Suggesting "moving does no harm" proposes behavioral change. Hypothetical framing tests patient openness to psychosocial approach. It implies current inactivity isn't medically necessary. This positions change as possible and desirable.

Hypothetical Treatment Directions

Practitioners mark behavior as inadequately accounted for. "It's still not quite clear to me" implies pain alone doesn't explain inactivity. This subtly challenges the inevitability of patient's limitations. It creates space for alternative explanations.

Insufficient Explanation Framing

Agency Attribution

Tentative language protects practitioners from direct confrontation. "Suppose we would say" creates hypothetical distance. Institutional "we" deflects personal accountability for challenging patient. Manages delicacy of questioning patient's account.

Hedging and Distancing

Separating mental willingness from bodily capacity is key strategy. Patients position mind as willing agent, body as limiting force. This preserves moral identity while claiming physical limitation. Practitioners challenge this separation to encourage behavior change.

Mind-Body Contrast Management

Patients contrast mental willingness with physical limitations. They present wanting to function but being prevented by their body. This construction manages moral identity and accountability. It establishes pain as authentic and burdensome.

Willing But Unable Identity

Attributing agency makes past actions accountable. If you choose to lie down, why did you choose inactivity? This provokes defensive responses from patients. Conversations spiral into frustrating circular patterns.

Learn Before

Related