Learn Before
Fill in the Blank

An undergraduate researcher at KPU is evaluating feedback from three peer reviewers on a manuscript. The study's main finding is a positive relationship between 'mindfulness practice duration' and 'subjective well-being' represented on a scatterplot.

Here are the assessments made by the three reviewers:

  • Reviewer 1: 'The scatterplot shows data points trending upward from the lower-left to the upper-right. This is a negative relationship, so your claim of a positive relationship is incorrect.'
  • Reviewer 2: 'Since there are some individual participants with low mindfulness scores who reported higher well-being than some participants with high mindfulness scores, this scatterplot fails to show a positive relationship; a true positive relationship requires every single high score to match a higher score.'
  • Reviewer 3: 'The scatterplot displays data points trending upward from the lower-left to the upper-right, which correctly represents a positive relationship. Even though some individuals deviate from the main pattern, this is a normal characteristic of statistical co-variation, making your conclusion valid.'

By evaluating these three critiques based on the scientific definition and visual representation of correlational relationships, the researcher concludes that only Reviewer ____ (enter the digit 1, 2, or 3) provided a methodologically accurate and valid evaluation.

0

1

Updated 2026-06-16

Contributors are:

Who are from:

Tags

KPU

Research Methods in Psychology - 4th American Edition @ KPU

Related