Analyzing an Economic Statement
An economist makes the following statement: 'A decrease in the price of gasoline will lead to an increase in the number of miles people drive, holding all other things constant.' Explain the purpose of the phrase 'holding all other things constant' in this context. What are two specific, different types of factors that this assumption requires us to ignore?
0
1
Tags
Social Science
Empirical Science
Science
Economy
CORE Econ
The Economy 1.0 @ CORE Econ
Ch.2 Technology, Population, and Growth - The Economy 1.0 @ CORE Econ
Economics
Introduction to Microeconomics Course
Analysis in Bloom's Taxonomy
Cognitive Psychology
Psychology
Related
Malthusian Assumption: Labor Force Proportional to Population
Economic Model of an Umbrella Market
An economist creates a model to predict weekly ice cream sales. The model's only variable is the average daily temperature, assuming all other factors that could influence sales are held constant. The model predicts that a 10-degree increase in temperature will cause sales to rise by 20%. However, after a week of 10-degree warmer weather, the economist observes that sales actually fell by 5%. Which of the following statements best analyzes the discrepancy between the model's prediction and the real-world outcome?
Evaluating a Bicycle Rental Model
Analyzing an Economic Statement
When an economist uses the 'ceteris paribus' assumption to build a model, it signifies that the factors being held constant are considered irrelevant to the real-world economic outcome.
Designing a Predictive Model for Event Attendance
To analyze the specific impact of a single factor on an economic outcome, economists use the ____ assumption, which involves holding all other relevant factors constant.
An economist wants to build a simple model to understand how a change in the price of gasoline affects the number of people using public transportation. Arrange the following steps in the logical order required to apply the 'holding other things constant' assumption and evaluate the model's outcome.
An economic model is built to predict the demand for a specific brand of smartphone. The model assumes that if the price of the smartphone is lowered, the quantity demanded will increase. However, when the company lowers the price, they observe that sales actually decrease. Based on the principle of 'holding other things constant,' which of the following is the most plausible explanation for this outcome?
A researcher wants to build a simple economic model to determine how a change in a coffee shop's weekly advertising budget affects its total weekly sales. To isolate the effect of advertising alone, which of the following represents the correct application of the 'holding other things constant' assumption for this model?
Interpreting Model Results Under the Ceteris Paribus Assumption