Analyzing Price Disparities
On January 14, 1997, along the Kerala coast, it was observed that in seven local markets where the quantity of fish supplied perfectly matched the quantity demanded, the price for the same type of fish still varied drastically, from Rs4 to over Rs7 per kilogram. In a single, well-functioning market, what would you expect to happen to such price differences over time? Based on the situation described, explain the most likely reason this did not occur.
0
1
Tags
SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19)
Biomedical Sciences
Economics
Economy
Introduction to Microeconomics Course
Social Science
Empirical Science
Science
CORE Econ
Related
Bargaining Power and Prices in the Kerala Wholesale Fish Market (Figure 8.22, 14 January 1997)
Market Inefficiency in Coastal Fisheries
On January 14, 1997, along the Kerala coast, fishermen in the town of Badagara discarded eleven boatloads of fish due to a local surplus. At the same time, just 15 km away in Chombala, there was a significant shortage, with many buyers unable to find any fish. Based on this information, what is the most likely reason for this market outcome?
Critiquing Market Performance
Analyzing Price Disparities
The events in the Kerala fish market on January 14, 1997, demonstrated several distinct market imbalances. Match each location or group of locations with the specific economic situation that occurred there.
True or False: The events of January 14, 1997, on the Kerala coast—where a surplus of fish in one town led to waste while a nearby town experienced a shortage—demonstrate an efficient market because prices were free to vary between locations.
Evaluating a Potential Arbitrage Opportunity
On January 14, 1997, along the Kerala coast, fishermen in one town discarded large amounts of unsold fish, while in a nearby town, numerous buyers could not find any fish to purchase. In the few local markets where supply and demand did balance, prices for the same type of fish varied significantly. What does this specific situation most clearly demonstrate?
When one town has a large product surplus and very low prices, while a nearby town has a severe shortage and high prices, the market has failed to allocate resources efficiently. The specific economic process that is being prevented from occurring, which would normally correct this imbalance, is known as ______.
Imagine you are a fisherman who has just arrived at the port in Badagara on January 14, 1997. You observe that a large surplus of fish has caused prices to collapse, and some fishermen are even discarding their catch. At the same time, you are aware that other nearby coastal towns exist. Given this specific situation, which of the following actions represents the most economically rational response to try and maximize your revenue?
Reasons for the Failure of Competitive Equilibrium in the Kerala Fish Market