Learn Before
Are non-monetary rewards effective in attracting peer reviewers? A natural experiment
Are non-monetary rewards effective in attracting peer reviewers? A natural experiment
Source: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11192-018-2912-6
Published: 2018-09-20. Inspected version: Published journal article. Retrieved: 2026-11-09T20:44:52.495233+00:00.
This reference identifies evidence used in the AI Scientific Oversight landscape. Its assertions retain the scope and limitations stated by the source; institutional authorship is not independent validation.
0
1
Tags
Scientific Oversight of AI-Assisted Research
1Cademy
Related
Reviewer Engagement Trends at a Journal: Cause for Concern
Motivating Experts to Contribute to Digital Public Goods: A Personalized Field Experiment on Wikipedia
Fostering Public Good Contributions with Symbolic Awards: A Large-Scale Natural Field Experiment at Wikipedia
Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective: Definitions, theory, practices, and future directions
What Policies Increase Prosocial Behavior? An Experiment with Referees at the Journal of Public Economics
Related
Reviewer Engagement Trends at a Journal: Cause for Concern
Motivating Experts to Contribute to Digital Public Goods: A Personalized Field Experiment on Wikipedia
Fostering Public Good Contributions with Symbolic Awards: A Large-Scale Natural Field Experiment at Wikipedia
Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective: Definitions, theory, practices, and future directions
What Policies Increase Prosocial Behavior? An Experiment with Referees at the Journal of Public Economics