Learn Before
Can LLM feedback enhance review quality? A randomized study of 20K reviews at ICLR 2025
Can LLM feedback enhance review quality? A randomized study of 20K reviews at ICLR 2025
Source: https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.09737v1
Published: 2025-04-13. Inspected version: arXiv v1 preprint. Retrieved: 2026-11-09T20:30:29.011867+00:00.
This reference identifies evidence used in the AI Scientific Oversight landscape. Its assertions retain the scope and limitations stated by the source; institutional authorship is not independent validation.
0
1
Tags
Scientific Oversight of AI-Assisted Research
1Cademy
Related
Crowdsourcing citation-screening in a mixed-studies systematic review: a feasibility study
An evaluation of Cochrane Crowd found that crowdsourcing produced accurate results in identifying randomized trials
AI-Assisted Peer Review at Scale: The AAAI-26 AI Review Pilot
Use and Effects of LLMs in Peer Review: A Randomized Experiment and Survey at ICML 2026
On Violations of LLM Review Policies
FAQs - Peer Community In
Guide for Authors
Frequently asked questions
Related
Crowdsourcing citation-screening in a mixed-studies systematic review: a feasibility study
An evaluation of Cochrane Crowd found that crowdsourcing produced accurate results in identifying randomized trials
AI-Assisted Peer Review at Scale: The AAAI-26 AI Review Pilot
Use and Effects of LLMs in Peer Review: A Randomized Experiment and Survey at ICML 2026
On Violations of LLM Review Policies
FAQs - Peer Community In
Guide for Authors
Frequently asked questions