Frustration Over Immediate Rejection of Non-COVID-19 Papers
During the COVID-19 pandemic, some researchers expressed frustration that high-impact medical journals were desk-rejecting non-COVID-19 related research papers almost immediately after submission. This rapid rejection rate led to concerns that non-COVID-19 research was not being thoroughly evaluated due to the overwhelming focus on pandemic-related submissions.
0
1
Contributors are:
Who are from:
Tags
CSCW (Computer-supported cooperative work)
Computing Sciences
Related
Mariska Leeflang tweets about how many COVID papers are being published but they are making little policy difference
Charulatha Banerjee @drcbjee tweets about the need for more evidence base for publishing on COVID-19
Research Knowledge Sharing During a Pandemic: A Call to Action
Joni Coleman tweets from a UCL Press conference on questions arising regarding impact of COVID-19 on research practices and culture
Francois Balloux's Twitter Thread on COVID-19 Information Overload
Formation of the Societal Experts Action Network (SEAN)
NY Times: COVID-19 Study Retractions in NEJM and The Lancet Raise Alarm Over Rushed Peer Review
Related
Mariska Leeflang tweets about how many COVID papers are being published but they are making little policy difference
Charulatha Banerjee @drcbjee tweets about the need for more evidence base for publishing on COVID-19
Research Knowledge Sharing During a Pandemic: A Call to Action
Joni Coleman tweets from a UCL Press conference on questions arising regarding impact of COVID-19 on research practices and culture
Francois Balloux's Twitter Thread on COVID-19 Information Overload
Formation of the Societal Experts Action Network (SEAN)
NY Times: COVID-19 Study Retractions in NEJM and The Lancet Raise Alarm Over Rushed Peer Review