Comparison of Ultimatum Game Behavior: Rural Missourians vs. Kenyan Farmers
Data from ultimatum game experiments with rural Missourians in the US reveals that they are even more likely to reject low offers than Kenyan farmers. In terms of proposals, nearly every Missourian Proposer offered half of the pie. These findings caution against making simple conclusions about fairness based on nationality, as the behavior of this US group differs significantly from US students and is, in some respects, more extreme than that of the Kenyan farmers.
0
1
Tags
Library Science
Economics
Economy
Social Science
Empirical Science
Science
CORE Econ
Ch.4 Strategic interactions and social dilemmas - The Economy 2.0 Microeconomics @ CORE Econ
The Economy 2.0 Microeconomics @ CORE Econ
Related
Comparison of Ultimatum Game Responses: Kenyan Farmers vs. US Students
Comparison of Proposer Offers: Kenyan Farmers vs. US Students
Comparison of Ultimatum Game Behavior: Rural Missourians vs. Kenyan Farmers
Source Study: Fischbacher, Fong, and Fehr (2009) on Fairness, Errors, and the Power of Competition
An economist conducts the same economic sharing experiment, known as the ultimatum game, in two different societies. In Society 1, the person proposing the split (the Proposer) consistently offers a large portion of the total sum (e.g., 40-50%). In Society 2, Proposers consistently offer a much smaller portion (e.g., 10-20%). Assuming the Proposers in both societies are primarily motivated by maximizing their own payoff, what is the most likely reason for this difference in behavior?
Interpreting Experimental Economic Data
Economists have conducted the ultimatum game with a wide variety of participant groups around the world, including students in industrialized nations, farmers in developing countries, and individuals from hunter-gatherer societies. A consistent finding is that the average offers from Proposers and the rejection rates from Responders can differ significantly between these groups. What is the primary implication of this observed behavioral variation?
Interpreting Cross-Cultural Economic Behavior
Analyzing Ultimatum Game Behavior in New Contexts
A researcher conducts an ultimatum game experiment exclusively with university students in a large European city. They find that Proposers offer, on average, 25% of the total sum, and Responders rarely reject offers above 10%. The researcher concludes that these findings reveal a universal human tendency to prioritize any personal gain over fairness. Based on what is known from applying this experiment across diverse populations, what is the most significant weakness in this conclusion?
Experimental results from applying the ultimatum game across diverse global populations consistently show that individuals in non-industrialized societies are more likely to accept any positive offer, aligning more closely with a model of pure economic self-interest than individuals in industrialized societies.
The application of a simple economic sharing game across a wide variety of human societies—from university students to hunter-gatherers—has revealed significant differences in how people propose and respond to offers. In some groups, low offers are common and accepted, while in others, low offers are frequently rejected, and Proposers tend to offer nearly half the sum. What is the most significant implication of these varied findings for the field of economics?
Value of Cross-Cultural Economic Experiments
Evaluating Competing Hypotheses in Economic Anthropology
Rationale for Cross-Cultural Ultimatum Game Studies
Interpreting Proposer Behavior in Economic Games
Researchers use the ultimatum game to study economic behavior in diverse populations. Match each participant group with the primary research rationale for studying them in this context.
The consistent finding from economic sharing experiments (ultimatum games) conducted across diverse global populations is that most people, regardless of cultural background, act as purely self-interested individuals, with proposers offering the minimum possible amount and responders accepting any non-zero offer.
An economic experiment involving two participants, a 'Proposer' and a 'Responder', is conducted in two different, isolated communities. In Community 1, Proposers consistently offer a nearly equal split of a sum of money, and Responders frequently turn down offers they perceive as low, resulting in neither participant receiving anything. In Community 2, Proposers tend to offer a small fraction of the sum, and Responders almost always accept any offer greater than zero. Based on a comparison of these outcomes, what is the most sound inference?
Evaluating the Significance of Experimental Economic Games
An economist studies a small, tight-knit community using an economic game where one person (the 'Proposer') suggests how to split a sum of money, and another person (the 'Responder') can accept or reject the offer. If the offer is rejected, neither person receives anything. The economist observes that Proposers consistently offer close to a 50/50 split, and Responders frequently reject any offer below 40%. The economist concludes: 'This community possesses an exceptionally strong, innate sense of fairness compared to other groups studied globally.' Which of the following statements presents the most significant challenge to the economist's conclusion?
Critiquing the 'Economic Man' Model
In an economic experiment, a 'Proposer' suggests how to split a sum of money with a 'Responder'. If the Responder accepts, they get the proposed split. If they reject, both get nothing. When this experiment was conducted with two different, isolated groups, the following patterns emerged:
- Group A: Proposers frequently offered 40-50% of the total sum. Responders in this group were very likely to reject any offer below 30%.
- Group B: Proposers most commonly offered 10-20% of the total sum. Responders in this group would typically accept any offer, even those as low as 10%.
An analyst reviews only the Proposer data and concludes: 'The Proposers in Group A are inherently more generous and have a stronger sense of fairness than the Proposers in Group B.'
Which of the following statements provides the strongest critique of the analyst's conclusion?
Critiquing an Experimental Design
Learn After
Evaluating a Political Advisor's Recommendation
In an economic experiment, a 'Proposer' suggests how to split a sum of money with a 'Responder'. If the Responder accepts, the money is split as proposed. If the Responder rejects, neither person gets anything. When this experiment was conducted with rural Missourians, nearly all Proposers offered a 50/50 split, and Responders were more likely to reject low offers than were Kenyan farmers in a similar experiment. What is the most accurate conclusion that can be drawn from this specific comparison?
Interpreting Economic Experiment Results
Based on the findings from ultimatum game experiments, the behavior of rural Missourians, who frequently proposed 50/50 splits and rejected low offers, confirms the general principle that individuals from Western, industrialized societies have a more uniform and stronger sense of economic fairness than individuals from non-Western, agrarian societies.
Implications of Intra-Group Variation in Economic Experiments
In an economic experiment, a 'Proposer' offers to split a sum of money with a 'Responder'. If the Responder accepts, they both get the money as proposed; if they reject, neither gets anything. Match each group or concept below with the experimental finding that best describes it, based on a specific comparison between rural Missourians and Kenyan farmers.
Economic experiments comparing rural Missourians and Kenyan farmers in a money-splitting game revealed that the Missourians were more likely to reject low offers. This finding challenges the validity of making broad generalizations about a population's sense of fairness based on their ______ alone, as behavior can vary significantly within the same country.
In an economic experiment, a "Proposer" suggests how to split a sum of money with a "Responder." If the Responder accepts, the money is split as proposed; if the Responder rejects, neither person gets anything. Research comparing rural Missourians and Kenyan farmers found that the Missourians were more likely to reject low offers, and nearly all Missourian Proposers offered a 50/50 split. Which of the following common assumptions about economic behavior is most directly contradicted by the actions of the rural Missourians in this experiment?
Based on the findings from ultimatum game experiments, the behavior of rural Missourians, who frequently proposed 50/50 splits and rejected low offers, confirms the general principle that individuals from Western, industrialized societies have a more uniform and stronger sense of economic fairness than individuals from non-Western, agrarian societies.