logo
How it worksResearch CommunitiesBenefitsAbout Us
Schedule Demo
Learn Before

  • Marginal Analysis of a Potential Pareto Improvement at 80,000 Tons of Bananas

Conditions for a Mutually Beneficial Agreement

A factory's production imposes a cost on a nearby community due to pollution. The factory owner and the community are considering an agreement where the community pays the factory to reduce its output by one unit. Explain, in economic terms, the two key monetary values that must be compared to determine if such a mutually beneficial agreement is possible. Describe the relationship between these two values that must exist for a deal to be feasible, and explain why this relationship makes both parties potentially better off.

0

1

8 days ago

Contributors are:

Gemini AI
Gemini AI
🏆 2

Who are from:

Google
Google
🏆 2

Tags

Library Science

Economics

Economy

Introduction to Microeconomics Course

Social Science

Empirical Science

Science

CORE Econ

Related

  • A chemical factory produces a product that sells for 50perunit.Atitscurrentoutputlevel,thecosttoproduceoneadditional(marginal)unitis50 per unit. At its current output level, the cost to produce one additional (marginal) unit is 48. The pollution from producing this single unit causes $10 worth of damage to a nearby fishery. Considering only this single, marginal unit of production, which of the following statements accurately analyzes the potential for a mutually beneficial agreement between the factory and the fishery?

  • Negotiating an Externality

  • Determining the Bargaining Range for an Externality

  • A chemical factory's production process pollutes a nearby lake, harming a commercial fishery. At the factory's current output level, producing one additional barrel of chemicals would generate 500inrevenueatadirectproductioncostof500 in revenue at a direct production cost of 500. The pollution from this single barrel would cause the fishery to lose $350 in income. Based on this marginal analysis, which of the following statements most accurately evaluates the situation?

  • A leather tannery sells its product for 120perunit.Thedirectcosttoproduceoneadditional(marginal)unitis120 per unit. The direct cost to produce one additional (marginal) unit is 115. The pollution from producing this single unit causes $4 worth of damage to a downstream farm. Based on this information, evaluate the following statement: 'A mutually beneficial agreement where the farm pays the tannery to reduce its output by this one unit is not possible because the tannery's gain from producing the unit is greater than the cost imposed on the farm.'

  • Calculating Minimum Compensation for an Externality

  • A paper mill sells its product for 1,000perton.Atitscurrentoutput,thedirectcosttoproduceoneadditional(marginal)tonis1,000 per ton. At its current output, the direct cost to produce one additional (marginal) ton is 980. The pollution from producing this single ton causes $50 worth of damage to a nearby tourist resort. A proposal is made for the resort to pay the mill to reduce its output by this one ton. Why is a mutually beneficial agreement possible in this situation?

  • Conditions for a Mutually Beneficial Agreement

  • Proposing a Mutually Beneficial Agreement

  • Evaluating a Proposed Agreement on Externalities