Learn Before
Conference Abstract Submission
To present a talk or poster at a professional conference, researchers typically must submit an abstract of their study to the event organizers in advance. These abstracts undergo a peer review process to determine if they are accepted for presentation, though this evaluation is generally less rigorous than the review process for manuscripts submitted to formal academic journals.
0
1
Tags
KPU
Research Methods in Psychology - 4th American Edition @ KPU
Related
Oral Presentation
Poster Presentation
Conference Abstract Submission
Examples of Professional Conferences in Psychology
Benefits of Conference Presentations
At professional psychology conferences, what are the primary methods used to officially disseminate research findings?
In the field of psychology, researchers use professional conferences to share their work in various ways and at different scales. Match each aspect of a professional conference with its corresponding characteristic.
A group of twelve psychology researchers meets for a single afternoon to officially present and discuss their latest study findings. According to the standard definitions of professional conferences in psychology, this gathering qualifies as a professional conference.
A psychology researcher is evaluating the 'official stature' of various professional activities for their career portfolio. Based on the standards for scale and formal dissemination, arrange the following scenarios from the highest level of official professional sharing to the most informal.
According to the description of professional conferences in psychology, which format of formal presentation is specifically described as 'visual'?
At a professional psychology conference, researchers are restricted to sharing their findings through official dissemination methods, such as oral talks and poster sessions.
When comparing a small afternoon gathering of a dozen researchers to a multi-day convention with thousands of attendees, an observer must recognize that while these events vary significantly in _____, the primary methods for official dissemination remain consistent.
Match each researcher's activity at a professional psychology conference with the specific category of communication or presentation it represents based on the textbook description.
An analysis of communication at professional conferences reveals that while official dissemination occurs through formal presentations, researchers also frequently share their work through _____ discussions.
Based on the text's discussion of peer feedback and publication, arrange the following dissemination steps in order from the initial informal/peer feedback stages to the final, most rigorous publication stage.
Learn After
How does the peer review process for an abstract submitted to a professional conference generally compare to the review process for a manuscript submitted to a formal academic journal?
When researchers submit an abstract to present their study at a professional psychology conference, the submission undergoes a peer review process that is typically more rigorous than the review process for a formal academic journal.
Dr. Aris is a social psychologist who has just finished a study on bystander intervention and wishes to share his findings at a regional psychology conference. Arrange the steps Dr. Aris must take in the correct chronological order, starting from the preparation of his submission.
Analyze the conference abstract submission process by matching each component with the scientific rationale that justifies its use in professional communication.
Match each term related to the professional conference submission process with its corresponding description.
In the context of professional psychology meetings, what is the primary role of the peer review process for conference abstract submissions?
In the context of evaluating research credibility, a scientist would justify viewing a conference presentation as preliminary evidence because its abstract submission undergoes a peer review process that is typically _____ rigorous than a journal's review.
Dr. Patel has just completed a pilot study on mindfulness and academic performance and wants to share preliminary findings with other researchers before conducting a larger follow-up study. She decides to submit an abstract to a regional psychology conference rather than immediately preparing a full manuscript for a peer-reviewed journal. Applying what is known about conference abstract submission, this decision is appropriate because the conference abstract submission process still involves a form of peer review, even though it is less rigorous than journal manuscript review.
A student comparing different forms of scholarly communication in psychology finds that both conference abstract submissions and journal manuscript submissions involve peer review. However, after analyzing each process in depth, the student concludes that journal manuscripts receive peer review that is generally _____ than the peer review applied to conference abstract submissions.
Maya, a first-year psychology student, encounters two sources reporting the same cognitive psychology finding: (1) a conference presentation abstract and (2) a published journal article on the same study. She must evaluate which source provides stronger scholarly evidence. Arrange the following reasoning steps in the logical order Maya should apply to reach a well-justified credibility judgment.
What are the typical requirements and evaluation processes for a researcher who wants to present a talk or poster at a professional conference, and how does this evaluation compare to that of formal academic journals?
Based on the evaluation processes for conference abstracts and journal manuscripts, explain how the peer review process Dr. Smith's study undergoes will differ in rigor and outcome depending on the chosen presentation format.
A student researcher is reviewing a peer-reviewed conference abstract and a peer-reviewed academic journal article on the same topic. Applying your knowledge of the evaluation rigor for these formats, explain why the student should evaluate the findings in the journal article as more thoroughly vetted than the findings in the conference abstract.