Learn Before
Continued post-retraction citation of a fraudulent clinical trial report, 11 years after it was retracted for falsifying data
Continued post-retraction citation of a fraudulent clinical trial report, 11 years after it was retracted for falsifying data
Source: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11192-020-03631-1
Published: 2020-10-14. Inspected version: Published journal article. Retrieved: 2026-11-09T20:33:12.845874+00:00.
This reference identifies evidence used in the AI Scientific Oversight landscape. Its assertions retain the scope and limitations stated by the source; institutional authorship is not independent validation.
0
1
Tags
Scientific Oversight of AI-Assisted Research
1Cademy
Related
Continued use of retracted papers: Temporal trends in citations and (lack of) awareness of retractions shown in citation contexts in biomedicine
Inclusion of Retracted Studies in Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Interventions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
A randomized trial alerting authors, with or without coauthors or editors, that research they cited in systematic reviews and guidelines has been retracted
The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship
PROV-DM: The PROV Data Model
Guidelines | Nanopublications
Related
Continued use of retracted papers: Temporal trends in citations and (lack of) awareness of retractions shown in citation contexts in biomedicine
Inclusion of Retracted Studies in Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Interventions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
A randomized trial alerting authors, with or without coauthors or editors, that research they cited in systematic reviews and guidelines has been retracted
The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship
PROV-DM: The PROV Data Model
Guidelines | Nanopublications