Deciding the RL component to fix
Question: In the optimization verification check, when should you conclude that the reinforcement learning method itself needs improvement rather than the reward signal?
Sample answer: You should focus on improving the reinforcement learning method when the trajectory produced by the human or expert is rewarded more highly than the trajectory produced by the agent.
Key points:
- Compare the expert and agent trajectories
- The expert trajectory receives the higher reward
- This suggests the reward definition is probably acceptable, but the optimizer is not finding the better behavior
Rubric: The response must state that the expert and agent trajectories are compared and that the expert trajectory gets the higher reward.
0
1
Tags
Machine Learning
Deep Learning
Supervised Learning
Dive into Deep Learning @ D2L
Data Science
Machine Learning Strategy
Machine Learning Yearning @ DeepLearning.AI
Related
Diagnosing an RL problem with verified rewards
When Reward Scores Favor the Wrong Outcome
Interpreting _____ in reward verification
Match the trajectories and reward comparison to their meanings.
Reward Comparison for a Reinforcement Learning Check
What It Means When the Human Trajectory Outperforms the Learned One
Autonomous Drone Landing Reward Diagnosis
Deciding the RL component to fix
What does it mean if a human plan scores lower than an automated plan on the reward model?
What Optimization Verification Checks