Learn Before
The Feasible Frontier for Production
Downward Slope of the Feasible Frontier and Opportunity Cost
The feasible frontier has a negative or downward slope, which graphically represents the concept of opportunity cost. Due to resource scarcity, producing more of one good necessitates reallocating resources, thereby reducing the production of another. The magnitude of the frontier's slope at any point measures the opportunity cost of producing one more unit of the good on the horizontal axis, expressed in terms of the quantity of the other good that must be sacrificed.
0
1
Tags
Economics
Economy
Introduction to Microeconomics Course
The Economy 2.0 Microeconomics @ CORE Econ
CORE Econ
Social Science
Empirical Science
Science
Related
Activity: Identifying Pareto-Efficient Allocations That Benefit Angela
The Feasible Frontier Production Function in the Angela-Bruno Model
Baseline Case - Angela's Optimal Outcome as an Independent Farmer
Detailed Description of Figure 5.16 - The Impact of New Labor Legislation
Feasible Set in the Angela-Bruno Model
Evaluating a Production Strategy
Downward Slope of the Feasible Frontier and Opportunity Cost
Concave Shape of the Feasible Frontier and Diminishing Marginal Returns
Allocation R (16, 34) as a Counter-Offer with Equivalent Surplus for Bruno
A country's feasible frontier for producing two goods, consumer electronics and agricultural products, is typically drawn as a curve that is bowed outwards from the origin (concave). What is the primary economic reason for this characteristic shape?
A manufacturing firm produces two types of goods: widgets and gadgets. The firm's production capabilities can be represented by a standard downward-sloping, concave feasible frontier, with widgets on the vertical axis and gadgets on the horizontal axis. Match each production scenario with its correct economic interpretation relative to this frontier.
Calculating Opportunity Cost on a Production Frontier
A technological improvement that increases the efficiency of producing only one of two goods will cause a parallel outward shift of the entire feasible frontier for production.
Analyzing a Policy Shift Using the Feasible Frontier
If an economy is operating at a point inside its feasible frontier for production, it means that it is possible to increase the output of one good without ____ the output of another.
A country's economy produces two goods, industrial robots and wheat, and is currently operating at a point on its feasible production frontier. At this point, it produces 5,000 robots and 20 million tons of wheat annually. If the government mandates an increase in robot production to 6,000 units, what is the direct and necessary consequence for wheat production, assuming no change in technology or the total amount of available resources?
A firm's production capabilities for two products, X and Y, are represented by a standard downward-sloping, concave feasible frontier. Given the following three production scenarios, arrange them in descending order based on their level of productive efficiency.
Evaluating a Production Proposal
Bruno's Feasible Set under Coercion
Learn After
Production Trade-offs for an Economy
An economy can produce two goods: grain and computers. Its production possibilities are represented by a curve that is bowed outwards (concave to the origin), with grain on the vertical axis and computers on the horizontal axis. Consider two points on this curve: Point A, representing high grain production and low computer production, and Point B, representing low grain production and high computer production. How does the opportunity cost of producing one additional computer at Point A compare to the opportunity cost at Point B?
Interpreting the Feasible Frontier's Slope
An economy can produce two goods: tablets and smartphones. If it uses all its resources, it can produce either 100 tablets and 0 smartphones, or 0 tablets and 50 smartphones. Assuming the trade-off between producing these two goods is constant, what is the opportunity cost of producing one additional smartphone?
An economy produces consumer goods (measured on the vertical axis) and capital goods (measured on the horizontal axis). It is currently operating at a point on its feasible production frontier where the slope is -2.5. What is the economic interpretation of this value?
An economy's production possibilities for two goods, 'Capital Goods' (horizontal axis) and 'Consumer Goods' (vertical axis), are represented by a downward-sloping curve that is bowed outwards from the origin. The economy is currently operating at Point A, where large amounts of Consumer Goods and small amounts of Capital Goods are produced, and the curve is relatively flat. The economy considers shifting to Point B, further down the curve, which represents producing fewer Consumer Goods and more Capital Goods, and where the curve is relatively steep. Which statement best analyzes the opportunity cost associated with producing Capital Goods at these two points?
Consider an economy's feasible production frontier with consumer goods on the vertical axis and capital goods on the horizontal axis. If this frontier is represented by a horizontal line, it means the economy can increase its production of capital goods without having to decrease its production of consumer goods.
A country's production possibilities for two goods, 'Good X' (on the horizontal axis) and 'Good Y' (on the vertical axis), are shown on a graph. Match each characteristic of the feasible frontier's slope at a given point with its correct economic interpretation regarding the opportunity cost of producing Good X.
Calculating and Interpreting Opportunity Cost
On a graph representing an economy's production choices for two goods, the magnitude of the downward slope of the feasible frontier at any given point measures the ____ of producing one additional unit of the good on the horizontal axis.