Public Confusion from Decentralized Expert Messaging on Social Media
During public health crises, the lack of centralized messaging alignment among independent experts on social media platforms can lead to public confusion. Unlike official institutions (e.g., the CDC) that coordinate clear and consistent messages, individual experts sharing varied opinions on issues with limited evidence can inadvertently create mixed messages and frustration for the public. This phenomenon was notably highlighted by epidemiologist Dr. Caitlin Rivers during the COVID-19 pandemic.
0
1
Contributors are:
Who are from:
Tags
CSCW (Computer-supported cooperative work)
Computing Sciences
Related
Chris von Csefalvay tweets in a thread that harmful attitudes towards epidemiologists and the factions within epidemiology as a field distracts researchers from achieving insights into COVID. Strikes interesting debate with other epidemiologists
Soragni:Lab tweets that experts from unrelated fields should not contribute to COVID-19 research
James Todaros tweet about not finding a consensus on the IFR and current WHO estimates
Roberto Rocha has a twitter thread on the conversation between scientists on finding a consensus about covid-19
Dr.Saskia Popescu tweets about the conversation surrounding what airborne actually means in the context of COVID-19
Geoffrey Siwo tweets about crowdsourced COVID-19 gene library that helps reach consensus
Kareem Carr tweets about how scientist to scientist debates can end up, heated but looking for the same answer
Research Knowledge Sharing During a Pandemic: A Call to Action
Misinterpretation of Scientific Critiques on Evidence Sufficiency
Kareem Carr on Science Communication Mistakes Among Scientists
Lack of Data Transparency in COVID-19 Research
Public Confusion from Decentralized Expert Messaging on Social Media
Adversarial Postures Towards the WHO as a Barrier to Scientific Consensus