https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360131519301435?casa_token=mft8BwHzitoAAAAA:bvZbyzBC9Q30HmNdx-J2e_o78M6mT-eSUqgxQmlGpZmbgErNUiI7O1RV63_LTOhHrCaWGGQnjg

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360131515300087?casa_token=qIkiHQhJmocAAAAA:Nz_RF0nthXlU9Qr6oFQpY0XU2XYLfGOc8j56UW9Ao0vmCyWPgwdN841u7Qn6EiOvfjjtbRQi0w

Columbia University

- remote labs = remote control of a physical lab at a university
- benefits of remote labs = accessibility, lower costs, possibility to collaborate with peers from abroad, gives student sense of autonomy, teachers can simultaneously supervise multiple groups at once
- found that students learn well from any type of lab and motivational and social factors highly influenced learning outcomes
- remote labs appeared to be just as effective as hands-on labs for student learning, even though students rated the effectiveness of the remote labs lower
- argument for traditional in-person labs argue for the importance for students to learn how to reconcile and explain differences between expected and experimental results
- argument for non-traditional remote labs argue that remote labs allow for repeatability which fosters deeper learning

Learn Before

Related