Learn Before
On Liberty (Book)
Evaluating the Principle of Individual Liberty
A foundational principle of 19th-century political philosophy states that the only legitimate reason for society to interfere with an individual's freedom of action is to prevent harm to others. Consider a modern debate, such as government regulation of sugary drinks to combat public health issues like obesity and diabetes. Evaluate the validity of using this philosophical principle to argue against such regulations. In your response, address the strengths and weaknesses of the principle when applied to issues where 'harm' may be indirect, societal, or self-inflicted.
0
1
Tags
Social Science
Empirical Science
Science
Economy
CORE Econ
Economics
Introduction to Microeconomics Course
The Economy 2.0 Microeconomics @ CORE Econ
Related
Firm Structures and Individual Autonomy
Freedom and the Modern Workplace
A technology company operates with a rigid, top-down management structure. Engineers are assigned tasks by project managers and are expected to complete them according to strict specifications and deadlines, with little to no say in the overall project direction or the creative process. Based on the philosophical principles regarding individual freedom and human development, which statement best represents a critique of this work environment?
According to the principles outlined in the 1859 philosophical work On Liberty, the conventional relationship between an employer and a worker is fundamentally beneficial for fostering the worker's individual autonomy and personal development.
Hierarchical Work and Personal Development
A central theme in a significant 1859 work of political philosophy is that individual liberty should only be curtailed to prevent harm to others. Given this principle, which of the following governmental actions is the most justifiable?
Match each philosophical principle with the scenario that best illustrates it.
Evaluating the Principle of Individual Liberty
An influential 1859 work on political philosophy argues that threats to individual freedom come not only from government laws but also from prevailing social norms and opinions. In a society where the majority's opinion can enforce conformity through social pressure, even without legal backing, what specific danger to liberty does this situation illustrate?
Censorship and the Tyranny of the Majority