Learn Before
  • Achieving Mutually Beneficial Outcomes through the Constrained Choice Problem

Formulating a Mutually Beneficial Negotiation

Imagine two business partners, Alex and Ben, are looking to re-negotiate their profit-sharing agreement from its current state. You are tasked with using a mathematical optimization model to find a new agreement that is guaranteed to make both of them strictly happier than they are now. Your model is designed to maximize Alex's profit. How must you define the constraint on Ben's profit to ensure any solution found is a 'win-win' for both partners? Briefly explain your reasoning.

0

1

12 days ago

Contributors are:

Who are from:

Tags

Social Science

Empirical Science

Science

Economy

Economics

CORE Econ

Introduction to Microeconomics Course

The Economy 2.0 Microeconomics @ CORE Econ

Related
  • Finding a Win-Win Economic Outcome

  • In a two-person economy, an economist is using a constrained optimization model to find a new allocation of resources for individuals A and B that is mutually beneficial. The model is set to maximize the utility of individual A (U_A), subject to a constraint on the utility of individual B (U_B). The initial utility levels from their current allocation are U_A^0 and U_B^0. To guarantee that any resulting allocation is a 'win-win' scenario where both individuals are strictly better off, how must the constraint on individual B's utility be formulated?

  • Consider a two-person economic scenario where an analyst uses a constrained optimization model to find an improved allocation of goods, starting from an initial distribution. If the model maximizes Person 1's welfare subject to a constraint on Person 2's welfare, setting that constraint equal to Person 2's initial welfare level is a sufficient method to ensure that any resulting solution makes both individuals strictly better off.

  • Formulating a Mutually Beneficial Negotiation

  • Evaluating Optimization Strategies for Win-Win Negotiations

  • An analyst is using a constrained optimization model to reallocate resources between two parties. The model is set to maximize Party A's payoff, subject to a constraint on Party B's payoff. Match each formulation of the constraint on Party B's payoff to the guaranteed outcome of the solution, assuming a solution exists.

  • In a two-party negotiation, an analyst is using a constrained optimization model to find a 'win-win' outcome where both parties are made strictly better off than their initial positions. Party A's initial payoff is 50, and Party B's initial payoff is 80. If the model is set up to maximize Party A's payoff, the constraint on Party B's payoff must be set to be strictly greater than ____.

  • An economist wants to use a constrained optimization model to find a new allocation of resources between two parties, ensuring the outcome is a 'win-win' where both are made strictly better off than their starting point. Arrange the steps of this process into the correct logical sequence.

  • An analyst uses a constrained optimization model to find a new, efficient allocation for two parties, Party A and Party B, starting from an initial distribution of goods. The model is set up to maximize Party A's payoff. The resulting new allocation successfully makes Party A strictly better off, but leaves Party B's payoff at exactly the same level as their initial payoff. What does this specific outcome imply about the constraint placed on Party B's payoff during the optimization?

  • An economic consultant is hired to find a 'win-win' resource reallocation for two business partners, Alex and Ben. Their initial weekly profits are 500and500 and 700, respectively. The consultant uses a mathematical model that maximizes Alex's profit subject to the condition that Ben's profit must be at least 700.ThemodelidentifiesanewarrangementwhereAlexsprofitis700. The model identifies a new arrangement where Alex's profit is 550 and Ben's profit is $700. Which of the following statements provides the most accurate critique of the consultant's method for ensuring a strictly mutually beneficial ('win-win') outcome?