In just-in-time agent systems, how does modular composability frame harness generation?

Enforcing the fixed four-module protocol prevents generative models from emitting arbitrary, unconstrained code scripts.

Into what specific type of problem does the four-module structural constraint convert open-ended program generation?

Explain how decomposing an operational scaffold into a fixed four-module protocol alters the generation mechanism and boundary constraints of agent harnesses.

Match each protocol module to its functional responsibility within the agent harness.

Order the modules according to their explicit directional dependency contract in the four-module harness protocol.

Based on the principles of modular composability, explain why shifting from unconstrained synthesis to a protocol-constrained harness eliminates the risk of arbitrary script output.

In just-in-time agent systems, modular composability models harness generation as an untyped assembly space.

Analyze the structural role of capability orchestration ($F$) within the operational scaffold, focusing on its placement and dependency relationships with upstream and downstream modules.

Match each harness module to its position and relationship within the dependency flow.

Order the stages of harness generation under modular composability, from initial architectural decomposition to final constrained synthesis.

Explain how enforcing the specific directional dependency contract ($M \to P \to F \to A$) rectifies the architectural flaw observed in the team's original monolithic scripts.