A correct final answer can hide unsafe tool calls, leaked data, wasted loops, or unsupported intermediate claims. Trajectory evaluation inspects state transitions and actions as well as outcome.

Trajectory Evaluation Scores Decisions Along the Path

An assurance case structures a safety or reliability claim, its argument, supporting evidence, assumptions, and defeaters. It makes residual uncertainty reviewable instead of hiding it behind a score.

Assurance Cases Link Claims to Evidence

Groups may be routed to different tools, escalation delays, evidence quality, or error recovery even when final average accuracy looks similar. Evaluate path exposure and burden by group and need.

Fairness Can Fail Through Different Graph Paths

An interpretable agent graph lets investigators trace which nodes, inputs, models, rules, and tools influenced an outcome. A neat diagram is not enough if runtime decisions remain opaque.

Graph Interpretability Connects Structure, Decisions, and Evidence

In this situation—an answer is correct only after the agent queried a forbidden record—which choice best applies “Trajectory Evaluation Scores Decisions Along the Path”?

Learn Before

Related