Justification of the Averaging Method for Reservation Wage
A common model for determining an individual's lowest acceptable wage involves calculating the total expected value from being unemployed for a certain period and then employed for the remainder of a fixed planning timeline. The final step in this model is to divide this total expected value by the full length of the planning timeline. Explain the economic reasoning behind this final step. Why is it necessary to average the value over the entire timeline rather than using the total value or some other measure?
0
1
Tags
Science
Economy
CORE Econ
Social Science
Empirical Science
Economics
Introduction to Microeconomics Course
The Economy 2.0 Microeconomics @ CORE Econ
Related
Calculating an Individual's Reservation Wage
An individual calculates their reservation wage by averaging the expected value of their options over a fixed planning horizon. This calculation considers the utility received during a period of unemployment and the utility from a future job. If this individual becomes more optimistic and believes they will find a suitable job sooner (i.e., the expected period of unemployment shortens), how will this change affect their calculated reservation wage, assuming all other factors remain constant and the utility from employment is higher than from unemployment?
Justification of the Averaging Method for Reservation Wage
Rationale for the Reservation Wage Averaging Period
An individual determines their minimum acceptable wage by calculating the average expected value of their situation over a set time period. This calculation includes the value they receive while searching for a job for an expected number of weeks, followed by the value they receive from the new job for the remainder of the period. If the value received during the job search period were to increase (for instance, due to higher unemployment benefits), how would this affect the individual's minimum acceptable wage, assuming the value of the new job and the expected search time do not change?
An individual calculates their minimum acceptable wage by averaging their expected utility over a fixed time period, known as the planning horizon. This calculation includes an initial period of job searching followed by a period of employment. Suppose this individual extends their planning horizon from 50 weeks to 100 weeks, while the expected duration of their job search remains unchanged at 10 weeks. Assuming the utility from being employed is significantly higher than the utility from job searching, how will this extension of the planning horizon affect their calculated minimum acceptable wage?
An individual determines their minimum acceptable wage by averaging their expected utility over a fixed planning horizon. The calculation combines the utility from an initial period of job searching with the utility from a subsequent period of employment. According to this model, the weight assigned to the utility from future employment in this average calculation is independent of the expected length of the job search period.
An individual's minimum acceptable wage can be conceptualized by a formula that averages their expected value over a set period. The formula is:
[ (A × B) + (C × D) ] / E. Match each variable from this formula to the concept it represents in this model of decision-making.Critique of the Fixed Planning Horizon Assumption
Policy Impact on an Individual's Minimum Acceptable Wage
Derivation of the Weighted-Average Reservation Wage Equation
The Reservation Wage Equation (Weighted-Average Form)