How do ethical guidelines generally view psychological research that carries the potential to inflict harm that is more than minor or lasts for more than a short duration?

A psychology study that exposes participants to a stressful memory-recall task known to cause significant emotional distress lasting several weeks would generally be considered ethically justifiable, provided the potential scientific benefit of the findings is substantial.

Match each research scenario with the most likely ethical determination based on the severity and duration of the potential harm described.

Based on the ethical guidelines regarding the severity and duration of research harm, arrange these potential outcomes from the MOST likely to be ethically justified to the LEAST likely.

If a research study is expected to cause psychological distress that is considered 'more than minor,' how does the duration of that distress affect its ethical justification?

In evaluating a research proposal that induces emotional distress lasting for several months, an ethics board concludes that the scientific benefits are insufficient to permit such _____ research harm, as the severity and duration of the impact cannot be balanced by potential gains.

In general, psychological research that carries the potential to inflict harm that is more than _____, or that lasts for more than a short duration, is rarely considered to be ethically justified by its potential benefits.