- ‘A completely new culture of doing research.’ Coronavirus outbreak changes how scientists communicate
- How I’ve connected with other scientists online during the COVID-19 pandemic
- Responding to peer reviews is never fun. It’s harder when COVID-19 shuts down your lab

Multidisciplinary Collaborative COVID-19 Research in Science Magazine

- Calling all coronavirus researchers: keep sharing, stay open
- The COVID-19 Crisis Could Permanently Change Scientific Publishing

Multidisciplinary Collaborative COVID-19 Research in Nature Magazine

- How COVID-19 Is Changing Science
- Why Social Media Is Crucial for Frontline Physicians in the Fight against COVID-19

 Multidisciplinary Collaborative COVID-19 Research in Scientific American 

 Multidisciplinary Collaborative COVID-19 Research in Nature Magazine 

- BioIntegration
	- Mapping the Research output on Coronavirus: A Scientometric Study
- New York Times
        - Worldwide collaboration leading scientists to put aside their personal 
           ambitions and regular process of publishing papers once results are 
           found (shared immediately).
- Economist
- Bloomberg
	- A Pandemic Moves Peer Review to Twitter
-Eurekalert
        -Internal and International Collaboration on Publications During 
         Quarantine

Multidisciplinary Collaborative COVID-19 Research  from other journals and sources 

- Lost smell and taste hint COVID-19 can target the nervous system


Multidisciplinary Collaborative COVID-19 Research in M3 India  

- Science Magazine
- Nature Magazine
- ACM CSCW
- Scientific American
- Other journals and sources

University of Michigan - Ann Arbor

An unprecedented amount of knowledge has been generated in the past two months in the form of journal papers, blog posts, and other forms.
Journal reviewers have significantly expedited the review process, e.g., the New England Journal of Medicine posted a COVID-19 paper within 48 hours of submission. Many researchers disseminate their papers in the form of preprints or posts on the new Wu-han Clan Slack channel before journal publication.

Multidisciplinary Collaborative COVID-19 Research

Multidisciplinary Collaborative COVID-19 Research References

The peer review process has been drastically modified in order to accommodate expediated reviewing of enormous amounts of research papers. Some modifications and new initiatives include: 
- use of bioRxiv, medRxiv, or other preprint servers
- Review Commons Effort
- Special COVID-19 peer review committees 
- independent preprint and peer review initiatives


Currently, this is a place holder to define what's unique about peer review process since the pandemic.  It is to be described later more clearly.  


Peer review process since COVID-19 outbreak

- bioRxiv
- medRxiv 
- arXiv
-	Research Square
- PrePrints.Org
- OSFPreprints


List of preprint servers

Our CSCW2020 Paper Abstract should be written here.
- The influx of COVID-19 related papers.
- Hard to catch up for the researchers.
- The COVID-19 pandemic needs to be the priority for CSCW practitioners.
- CSCW tech solutions may be able to offer a valuable solution (call for action)


Learn Before

Related

Learn After