An Open Research Knowledge Graph (ORKG) comparison record organizes information from several research papers about one problem. D’Souza and colleagues (January 15, 2024) studied six records deliberately selected by two ORKG-team reviewers: three good examples of information organization and three pitfalls. Six field-specialist librarians each rated one record’s usefulness for specialists and lay readers (non-specialists). The glucose-sensor record was rated useful for specialists but not lay readers; the smart-city record was rated useful for lay readers, with specialist usefulness uncertain. None was rated useful for both. Uncertain meant unsure or unable to judge, not negative. These subjective judgments were not accuracy checks or actual learner tests; this selected audit does not estimate quality across ORKG.