Planning the Evaluation of Several Detector Fixes
Case context: Your team is reviewing failure cases from a fruit-quality classifier. After inspecting the dev set, several possible fixes are proposed, including changing preprocessing, adding more labeled examples, and adjusting the model architecture.
Question: What workflow choice should you make for evaluating these proposed fixes?
Sample answer: You should evaluate the candidate fixes in parallel so you can compare them efficiently.
Key points:
- Recognize that more than one improvement idea has been proposed.
- Choose a parallel evaluation workflow.
- Explain that parallel evaluation saves time and makes comparisons easier.
Rubric: The answer should explicitly recommend evaluating the several proposed improvements in parallel as the efficient workflow.
0
1
Tags
Machine Learning
Deep Learning
Supervised Learning
Dive into Deep Learning @ D2L
Data Science
Machine Learning Strategy
Machine Learning Yearning @ DeepLearning.AI
Related
Spreadsheet for Auditing Incorrect Validation Examples
How should a team evaluate several detector-improvement ideas efficiently?
Evaluating Improvement Ideas in Parallel
A team can _____ test several model ideas at the same time instead of checking them one by one.
Match each review strategy term to its correct description for comparing error sources across model ideas.
Order the steps for comparing several model-improvement ideas in one error-analysis pass.
Why Evaluate Several Fix Ideas in One Pass?
True or False: A machine learning team can compare several candidate fixes at once during its development cycle before deciding what to implement.
To compare several model improvement ideas efficiently, a team should perform _____ by reviewing the validation set’s mistakes.
Match each evaluation setup to the idea it represents when comparing ways to improve a classifier.
Order the steps that show why one error review can evaluate several model improvement ideas at once.
Why the fastest way to test improvement ideas is to compare them in parallel
Planning the Evaluation of Several Detector Fixes
Running several model-improvement tests efficiently