Procedural Practices in Agent Harnesses
In stateful agent harnesses, a procedural practice is an executable, experience-derived intervention designed to bridge the procedural-memory gap across independent executions. Rather than preserving diagnostic lessons as informal postmortem notes that an agent must rediscover or infer, a practice formalizes the lesson as an inspectable, versioned artifact—such as a state-local prompt instruction, an explicit constraint, a transition check, or a dynamic verification action triggered when visible signals indicate elevated failure risk. By encoding operational lessons into the shared runbook, procedural memory persists across runs and can be enacted mechanically by the runtime.
0
1
Tags
Prep Sessions
Long-Horizon Agent Reliability: Stateful Scaffolding and Runtime Verification @ University of Michigan - Ann Arbor
Ch.3 State Persistence and Continuous Optimization - Long-Horizon Agent Reliability: Stateful Scaffolding and Runtime Verification @ University of Michigan - Ann Arbor
Failure-Driven Harness Optimization and Procedural Memory - Long-Horizon Agent Reliability: Stateful Scaffolding and Runtime Verification @ University of Michigan - Ann Arbor
Related
Failure-Driven Harness Optimization
Golden Rules for Harness Profile Development
Control Drift in Multi-Task Harness Optimization
Sparse Routing in Shared Agent Runbooks
Multi-Task Harness Abstraction via Hyper-Agent
Procedural Practices in Agent Harnesses
Single-Task Harness Adaptation Loop
Selective Filtering in Harness Learning
Procedural-Memory Gap in Autonomous Agents
Learn After
Which set of operational artifacts exemplifies the formalization of a procedural practice in a stateful agent harness?
In stateful agent harnesses, procedural memory persists across independent executions when operational lessons are encoded into the shared runbook.
Under what specific condition is a dynamic verification action triggered within a stateful agent harness?