1. Style

If you’re a Python programmer, then PyTorch will feel easy to pick up. It works the way you’d expect it to, right out of the box.

On the other hand, more coding languages are supported in TensorFlow than in PyTorch, which has a C++ API. You can use TensorFlow in both JavaScript and Swift. If you don’t want to write much low-level code, then Keras abstracts away a lot of the details for common use cases so you can build TensorFlow models without sweating the details.

2. Data and Model

What models are you using? If you want to use a specific pretrained model, like BERT or DeepDream, then you should research what it’s compatible with. Some pretrained models are available in only one library or the other, and some are available on both. The Model Garden and the PyTorch and TensorFlow hubs are also good resources to check.

What data do you need? If you want to use preprocessed data, then it may already be built into one library or the other. Check the docs to see—it will make your development go faster!

3. Project Goal

Where will your model live? If you want to deploy a model on mobile devices, then TensorFlow is a good bet because of TensorFlow Lite and its Swift API. For serving models, TensorFlow has tight integration with Google Cloud, but PyTorch is integrated into TorchServe on AWS. If you want to enter Kaggle competitions, then Keras will let you quickly iterate over experiments.

Think about these questions and examples at the outset of your project. Nail down the two or three most important components, and either TensorFlow or PyTorch will emerge as the right choice.

https://realpython.com/pytorch-vs-tensorflow/

PyTorch vs TensorFlow

In PyTorch, the CPU device can be explicitly indicated by torch.device('cpu'). This device represents all physical CPUs and memory on the system, meaning that PyTorch will attempt to utilize all available CPU cores for calculations allocated to it.

CPU Device Allocation in PyTorch

PyTorch is an open-source, imperative machine learning framework that accelerates the path from research prototyping to production deployment. It is considered a third-generation framework that uses a syntax similar to Python's NumPy to describe deep learning models.

University of Michigan - Ann Arbor

Google

Deep learning frameworks provide specialized software tools that streamline the construction, training, and deployment of neural networks. The availability of these efficient frameworks has made the design and implementation of whole system optimization significantly easier, which is a critical component in achieving high performance for complex deep learning pipelines.

Deep Learning Frameworks

- Ease of programming (development and deployment)
- Running Speed
- Truly open (open source with good governance)
- Popularity

Criterion for Choosing a Deep Learning Framework

Deep Learning Frameworks References

Keras is an open-source, high-level neural network library and API for Python, often used via TensorFlow. It is designed to reduce cognitive load by offering consistent and simple APIs, minimizing user actions for common use cases, and providing clear error messages.

Keras

TensorFlow is an end-to-end open source platform for machine learning. It has a comprehensive, flexible ecosystem of tools, libraries and community resources that lets researchers push the state-of-the-art in ML and developers easily build and deploy ML powered applications.

https://www.tensorflow.org/

TensorFlow

Theano is a Python library that allows you to define, optimize, and efficiently evaluate mathematical expressions involving multi-dimensional arrays. It is built on top of NumPy.

https://pypi.org/project/Theano/

Theano

PaddlePaddle, as the only independent R&D deep learning platform in China, has been officially open-sourced to professional communities since 2016. It is an industrial platform with advanced technologies and rich features that cover core deep learning frameworks, basic model libraries, end-to-end development kits, tools & components as well as service platforms. PaddlePaddle is originated from industrial practices with dedication and commitments to industrialization. It has been widely adopted by a wide range of sectors including manufacturing, agriculture, enterprise service, and so on while serving more than 2.3 million developers. With such advantages, PaddlePaddle has helped an increasing number of partners commercialize AI.

https://pypi.org/project/paddlepaddle/

PaddlePaddle

A truly open source deep learning framework suited for flexible research prototyping and production.

https://mxnet.apache.org/


mxnet

Lasagne is a lightweight library to build and train neural networks in Theano.

https://lasagne.readthedocs.io/

Lasagne

Eclipse Deeplearning4j is the first commercial-grade, open-source, distributed deep-learning library written for Java and Scala. Integrated with Hadoop and Apache Spark, DL4J brings AI to business environments for use on distributed GPUs and CPUs.

https://deeplearning4j.org/

DL4J

The Microsoft Cognitive Toolkit (CNTK) is an open-source toolkit for commercial-grade distributed deep learning. It describes neural networks as a series of computational steps via a directed graph. CNTK allows the user to easily realize and combine popular model types such as feed-forward DNNs, convolutional neural networks (CNNs) and recurrent neural networks (RNNs/LSTMs). CNTK implements stochastic gradient descent (SGD, error backpropagation) learning with automatic differentiation and parallelization across multiple GPUs and servers.

https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/cognitive-toolkit/

CNTK

Caffe is a deep learning framework made with expression, speed, and modularity in mind. It is developed by Berkeley AI Research (BAIR) and by community contributors. Yangqing Jia created the project during his PhD at UC Berkeley. Caffe is released under the BSD 2-Clause license.

https://caffe.berkeleyvision.org/

Caffe

High-level APIs in deep learning frameworks offer significant convenience by abstracting complex and potentially unstable operations, such as numerical stability, and allowing users to implement models concisely. This abstraction dramatically increases accessibility, enabling individuals without advanced statistical training to utilize deep learning. However, relying solely on high-level APIs presents drawbacks: it discourages the creation of custom, non-standard components and leaves practitioners unequipped to debug edge cases when the framework's abstractions fail. To invent novel architectures that frameworks do not natively support, deep learning practitioners must understand both the fundamental, from-scratch implementations and the concise, framework-based versions.

Trade-offs of High-Level APIs in Deep Learning

The development effort required to implement and experiment with deep learning models has decreased enormously since the early days of neural network research. Tasks that once demanded months of low-level engineering in C++ and assembly code—such as building and improving SN, an early Lisp-based deep learning simulator created by Bottou and Le Cun in 1988—can now be accomplished in minutes using modern high-level frameworks. This extraordinary reduction in implementation overhead has democratized deep learning model development, making it accessible to a far broader community of researchers and practitioners.

Productivity Gains in Deep Learning Implementation

DistBelief is an early, large-scale distributed deep learning system introduced by researchers in 2012. It serves as an important historical precursor in the evolution of deep learning tooling, having preceded more modern, widely adopted frameworks such as Caffe and TensorFlow. While it paved the way for distributed training, the lack of such mature computational tools at the time made implementing deep architectures like AlexNet a highly labor-intensive process.

DistBelief

Symbolic programming is a programming paradigm where computation is executed only after the entire program has been fully specified and compiled. This strategy, commonly used by deep learning frameworks, involves three main steps: defining the sequence of operations, compiling them into an executable format, and then supplying the required inputs to run the compiled program. Although it requires an upfront compilation step, the primary benefit of symbolic programming is significantly improved computational performance.

Symbolic Programming

Imperative (interpreted) programming and symbolic programming differ primarily in ease of use and computational efficiency. Imperative programming is generally easier to write and debug due to the immediate accessibility of intermediate variable values. In contrast, symbolic programming is more efficient and easier to port; by having the compiler see the full code before execution, it allows for significant optimization during compilation and enables the program to run in diverse environments independently of the original interpreter.

Comparison of Imperative and Symbolic Programming

Deep learning systems are typically structured with a frontend for direct user interaction—often utilizing languages like Python or C++—and a backend that manages the actual computations. Operations triggered by the frontend are seamlessly forwarded to the backend, which is implemented in highly optimized C++ for maximum performance. This backend maintains dedicated threads that continuously gather and execute queued tasks. The primary advantage of this architecture is that the frontend thread is spared from performing intensive calculations, preventing the slower execution speed of languages like Python from bottlenecking the overall computational throughput.

Learn Before

Related

Learn After