Learn Before
Randomized name signals and interview callbacks in Boston and Chicago
In a 2001–2002 correspondence experiment, Bertrand and Mullainathan sent 4,870 fictitious résumés to selected newspaper job ads in Boston and Chicago, randomly assigning White-sounding or African-American-sounding names. Interview callback rates were 9.65% and 6.45%, respectively: a 3.20 percentage-point gap, approximately 50% relative to 6.45%. Randomization supports attributing the sampled contrast to assigned name signals; actual applicants’ racial identities were not manipulated. The outcome was a callback—not a completed interview, job offer, hiring, or earnings. Selected ads, occupational categories, cities, and period limit generalization; no current nationwide rate is established.
Source: https://sendhil.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/Publication-52.pdf
0
1
Tags
Ch.13 Industrial-Organizational Psychology - Psychology @ OpenStax
Psychology @ OpenStax
OpenStax
OpenStax Psychology (2nd ed.) Textbook
Psychology
Social Science
Empirical Science
Science
Related
Illegal Interview Questions
Examples of Protected Groups in Hiring
A restaurant is hiring a new head chef. The hiring manager reviews four finalists. Which of the following decisions is the clearest example of hiring discrimination?
A company is making a final hiring decision for a customer service representative role. Which of the following actions by the hiring manager is the clearest example of hiring discrimination?
Federal Legislation Prohibiting Employment Discrimination
Randomized name signals and interview callbacks in Boston and Chicago