Learn Before
  • Bruno's Two-Step Optimization: Maximizing and Dividing the Joint Surplus

The MRS = MRT Condition for Pareto Efficiency and Maximizing Joint Surplus

The condition where the Marginal Rate of Substitution (MRS) equals the Marginal Rate of Transformation (MRT) identifies an allocation that is Pareto efficient. As demonstrated in scenarios involving both coercion (Case 1) and voluntary choice (Case 2), this point of tangency also corresponds to the allocation that maximizes the total joint surplus from the interaction, as no further mutually beneficial trades are possible.

Image 0

0

1

18 days ago

Contributors are:

Who are from:

Tags

Library Science

Economics

Economy

Introduction to Microeconomics Course

Social Science

Empirical Science

Science

CORE Econ

Ch.5 The rules of the game: Who gets what and why - The Economy 2.0 Microeconomics @ CORE Econ

The Economy 2.0 Microeconomics @ CORE Econ

Related
  • Bruno's Optimal Offer in Case 2 Lies on Angela's Reservation Indifference Curve

  • Figure - Bruno's Profit-Maximizing Choice

  • Allocation L as a Pareto-Efficient Outcome

  • A landowner makes a non-negotiable ('take-it-or-leave-it') offer to a worker, specifying hours of work and payment. The landowner's profit is the total output produced by the worker minus the payment. The landowner is constrained by the worker's 'minimum acceptance curve', which shows the lowest payment the worker will accept for any given amount of work. The relationship between work and output is shown by a 'production curve'. To maximize profit, the landowner must find the point on the worker's minimum acceptance curve that creates the largest possible vertical gap between the production curve (top) and the minimum acceptance curve (bottom). Which statement best describes the geometric property of this profit-maximizing point?

  • Landowner's Profit Maximization

  • Profit Maximization Condition

  • A landowner makes a 'take-it-or-leave-it' offer to a worker. The landowner's profit is maximized by finding the allocation of work hours that creates the largest possible gap between the total output produced (the feasible frontier) and the worker's minimum acceptable compensation (the reservation indifference curve). At the currently proposed allocation, the slope of the feasible frontier is steeper than the slope of the worker's reservation indifference curve. True or False: To increase profit, the landowner should adjust the offer to include fewer hours of work.

  • A landowner makes a 'take-it-or-leave-it' offer to a worker, specifying hours of work and the corresponding payment. The landowner's goal is to maximize their profit, which is the total output produced by the worker minus the payment. The offer must be acceptable to the worker, meaning it lies on the worker's 'reservation indifference curve' (the minimum payment they would accept for any given amount of work). The relationship between work and output is defined by a 'feasible frontier'.

    At a proposed allocation of 9 hours of work, the slope of the feasible frontier is 20 bushels, and the slope of the worker's reservation indifference curve is 15 bushels. To increase profit, what should the landowner do?

  • Optimizing a Landowner's Offer

  • Critique of a Profit Maximization Strategy

  • Landowner's Profit Calculation

  • A landowner makes a single, non-negotiable ('take-it-or-leave-it') offer of work hours and pay to a worker. The landowner aims to maximize profit, which is the total output produced by the worker minus the payment. Match each economic concept to its correct description within this scenario.

  • Analyzing a Sub-Optimal Offer

  • The MRS = MRT Condition for Pareto Efficiency and Maximizing Joint Surplus

  • Hypothetical Equal Division of Joint Surplus

  • Shift from Employment to Tenancy Contract

Learn After
  • Constant MRS at a Given Level of Free Time due to Parallel Indifference Curves