Learn Before
Simplified Ultimatum Game with Two Offers
Responder's Strategic Decision in the Ultimatum Game
To predict the outcome of an ultimatum game, one must first analyze the Responder's strategy. This involves evaluating the choice from the Responder's perspective: whether to accept a proposed division, such as a fair (50, 50) split or an unfair (80, 20) one. A key consideration is that a Responder might reject an offer, sacrificing their own payoff, to punish the Proposer for what they perceive as an ungenerous proposal.
0
1
Tags
Library Science
Economics
Economy
Introduction to Microeconomics Course
Social Science
Empirical Science
Science
CORE Econ
Related
Figure: Game Tree for a Simplified Ultimatum Game
Responder's Strategic Decision in the Ultimatum Game
In a strategic interaction, a 'Proposer' is given 50 offer' or a '0. Match each sequence of actions to its final monetary outcome.
In a one-time interaction, a 'Proposer' is given 50 offer' or a '0. From the Proposer's perspective, what is the fundamental trade-off when deciding between the two offers?
Analyzing Player Interdependence
In a one-shot interaction, a Proposer is endowed with 50 or an 'unfair offer' of 0. If the Proposer makes the 'unfair offer' and the Responder accepts it, what is the final monetary outcome for the Proposer and the Responder, respectively?
Rational Decision in a Simplified Game
In a single-round interaction, a 'Proposer' is given 50 offer' or a '0 for both. If the Proposer makes the '$20 offer', which statement best evaluates the central conflict the Responder faces?
Strategic Decision-Making Under Uncertainty
Evaluating a Strategic Decision
In a one-time interaction, an individual ('Proposer') is given 50 (keeping 20 (keeping 0. Arrange the events for a scenario where the $20 offer is made and subsequently rejected.
Proposer's Strategic Calculation
Learn After
Proposer's Strategic Decision in the Ultimatum Game
Responder's Punitive Reaction to Offers Breaching Social Norms