Restrained Claim Scope: No Automatic-Judge Validation, No Semantic-Evasion Claim, No Robust End-to-End QA Gains
The paper deliberately avoids stronger claims than the released artifact can support. In particular, it does not claim (i) automatic-judge validation of generation quality, (ii) semantic-evasion effects beyond what leakage controls measure, or (iii) robust end-to-end QA gains. The released qualitative bundles are positioned as useful inputs for future audits but are non-evidentiary until replicated with multiple independent annotators. This restrained scope is a deliberate feature of the strict-parity reporting policy, not an oversight.
0
1
Tags
Science
Auditable Strict-Parity Evaluation of Prerequisite-Graph Retrieval for RAG under Leakage Controls
Related
LectureBank-Full Decomposition: Diffusion+Quotas Drive ~18 R@10 Points; Contrast Gating Adds At Most ~1 Point (Statistically Tied)
Bounded Benchmark Validity: Two Question Families and 21/18 Unique Held-Out Targets Cap Statistical Power
Restrained Claim Scope: No Automatic-Judge Validation, No Semantic-Evasion Claim, No Robust End-to-End QA Gains
Language-Matched Seeding as a Prerequisite for Graph-Expansion Gains
HotpotQA External-Validity Probe: Adaptive Depth Does Not Transfer to a Denser Non-Prerequisite Graph (FullWiki-1k: Flat 93.4 / Hier 92.9 / Adaptive 94.0 R@10)