Situating Wikipedia as a health information resource in various contexts: A scoping review thematic analysis - quality of Wikipedia's health content
- 47 of the 89 articles (53%) talked about the quality of Wikipedia’s medical content
- This study accesses Wikipedia’s health information quality by considering different populations that may read it, as well as its reliability (reliability includes accuracy, comprehensiveness, completeness, and quality of references)
- Categorized populations into 3 groups: consumers, students, and professionals
0
1
Tags
CSCW (Computer-supported cooperative work)
Computing Sciences
Related
Situating Wikipedia as a health information resource in various contexts: A scoping review thematic analysis - Wikipedia as a health information source
Situating Wikipedia as a health information resource in various contexts: A scoping review thematic analysis - quality of Wikipedia's health content
Situating Wikipedia as a health information resource in various contexts: A scoping review thematic analysis - utility in education
Situating Wikipedia as a health information resource in various contexts: A scoping review thematic analysis - utility in research