Learn Before
Coasean Bargaining
Mechanism of Coasean Bargaining: Internalizing Social Costs for Pareto Efficiency
Sturges v Bridgman: A Coasean Bargaining Example
Coase used the legal case of Sturges v Bridgman to illustrate the principle of internalizing externalities. In the case, a court granted a doctor an injunction to stop a neighboring confectioner from using noisy machinery. By establishing the doctor's right to quiet, the ruling meant that the confectioner, if he wished to continue operating the machinery, would have to negotiate a payment to the doctor. This potential compensation forces the confectioner to weigh the full social cost of his noise, not just his private production costs, thereby demonstrating in a practical scenario how a Pareto-efficient outcome can be reached.
0
1
Tags
Social Science
Empirical Science
Science
CORE Econ
Economics
Economy
Introduction to Microeconomics Course
The Economy 2.0 Microeconomics @ CORE Econ
Related
Coase's Rationale for Private Bargaining: Informational Advantage
Sturges v Bridgman: A Coasean Bargaining Example
Mechanism of Coasean Bargaining: Internalizing Social Costs for Pareto Efficiency
Efficiency Outcome Independent of Initial Property Rights
Impact of Initial Property Rights on Income Distribution in Coasean Bargaining
Persistence of Unresolved Externalities Despite Coasean Bargaining
Sturges v Bridgman: A Coasean Bargaining Example
Role of the Legal Framework in Defining Property Rights and Reservation Options
A chemical factory's operations result in waste being discharged into a river, which negatively impacts a downstream fishing business. The government legally assigns the fishing business the right to a clean river. Assuming transaction costs are negligible, how does this assignment of rights lead to an efficient economic outcome?
Analyzing a Coasean Bargaining Scenario
A private negotiation process is initiated to resolve a negative externality between two parties. For this process to result in an economically efficient outcome, certain steps must occur in a logical sequence. Arrange the following events in the correct order.
The Signaling Effect of Property Rights
Evaluating Private Solutions to Externalities
A paper mill discharges pollutants into a lake, which harms a nearby tourist resort that relies on the lake's pristine condition. Initially, the mill only considers its own operational expenses when deciding how much paper to produce. If the legal system grants the resort the explicit right to a clean lake, how does this change the mill's calculation of its production costs, assuming private negotiation is possible?
In a private negotiation to resolve a negative externality where bargaining is costless, assigning the property right to the party creating the externality prevents the achievement of a socially efficient outcome because the external cost is not properly signaled or internalized.
Match each component of the private negotiation process for resolving an externality with its specific role in achieving an efficient outcome.
In a scenario where a firm's production creates a negative externality, the establishment of clear property rights and the possibility of private negotiation forces the firm to consider not only its private production costs but also the potential compensation it must pay to the affected party. By doing so, the firm's perceived marginal cost of production is shifted to align more closely with the true marginal ________ cost.
Applying the Coasean Mechanism with Reversed Property Rights