Academia employs fictional personas as "lore" to mask its distrust of neurodivergent minds. Students and faculty are categorized into familiar stereotypes: the "eccentric teacher," the "absent-minded professor," or the "clueless undergraduate." These labels allow institutions to find difference amusing rather than threatening. However, this tolerance is conditional—once these disabled minds cease to entertain or cross boundaries of acceptability, they are swiftly dismissed from academic spaces.

State University of New York at Binghamton

Higher education discriminates against mental disability, with a vested interest in removing people with academic disabilities from academia. This stems from the myth that people with divergent thinking are dangerous, resulting in strict standards of acceptable personality. The equation of medical and academic standards leads teachers to pathologize student personalities in the classroom, creating a secret population of neurodivergent minds who use "lore"—leveraging amusement at difference to mitigate distrust. Price applies Disability Studies (DS) to transform this dynamic.

Mad At School: Foreword (by Tobin Siebers)

Price, Margaret. 2011b. Mad at School: Rhetorics of Mental Disability and Academic Life. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

Reference for: Mad At School by Margaret Price

- Transforming How We Understand Academic Thinking
- The Great Myth

Price's Purpose and Core Claim

- Academic Standards as Medical Judgements
- The Consequences of Academic Standards for Personality

Learn Before

Related