Adding another user’s correction after expert correction can backfire, in which misconceptions are reinforced. Users may become more skeptical of the correction if they receive two similar corrections.

Expert Correction: Follow-up Corrections

Initial belief in misconceptions can influence the success of correcting these misconceptions. Observational corrections on social media using expert sources were more effective among those higher in initial misperceptions.

Expert Correction: Moderating Role of Initial Misconception

Observing a single correction from a reputable expert source can help reduce misconceptions about health misinformation, specifically regarding the Zika virus. Correction from reputable sources does not harm the credibility of the expert source.

Ohio State University, Columbus

Social media users observe others being corrected and correct their own misconceptions and attitudes. 

Observational Correction on Social Media

  Vraga, E. K., & Bode, L. (2017). Using Expert Sources to Correct Health Misinformation in Social Media. Science Communication, 39(5), 621–645. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547017731776


Learn Before

Related

Learn After