When a team is judged by results, it has to check whether its people, tools, and interactions are good enough to reach the target. That pressure can encourage experimentation, prudent risk-taking, and the continuous learning needed to stay effective over time.

Google

A meritocracy is only as good as the people in it, how they work together, and whether the results show that the group is meeting its goals. In practice, quality is judged by the team’s capability, the way members exchange ideas and challenge one another, and outcome measures that compare actual performance with intended objectives.

Conditions That Support a Strong Meritocracy

Measured outcomes serve as an objective test of whether a team’s decision process is actually producing good results.

Learn Before

Related