Short Answer

A cognitive psychologist calculates a computed FF ratio of 4.824.82 for an ANOVA comparing three training methods. If the critical value from the FF table is 3.203.20, apply the decision rules for ANOVA to state the psychologist's decision regarding the null hypothesis, and specify the relationship between the computed FF ratio, the critical value, and the pp-value in this scenario.

Question: A cognitive psychologist calculates a computed FF ratio of 4.824.82 for an ANOVA comparing three training methods. If the critical value from the FF table is 3.203.20, apply the decision rules for ANOVA to state the psychologist's decision regarding the null hypothesis, and specify the relationship between the computed FF ratio, the critical value, and the pp-value in this scenario.

Sample answer: The psychologist should reject the null hypothesis. Because the computed FF ratio of 4.824.82 is greater than the critical value of 3.203.20, the associated pp-value is less than the alpha level of .05.05.

Key points:

  • Apply the decision rule to reject the null hypothesis.
  • Recognize that the computed FF ratio (4.824.82) exceeds the critical value (3.203.20).
  • Specify that the corresponding pp-value is less than the alpha level of .05.05.

Rubric: Grading should be based on: 1) Accurately applying the decision rule to reject the null hypothesis. 2) Explaining the relationship that the computed FF ratio (4.824.82) is greater than the critical value (3.203.20). 3) Correctly stating that this relationship means the associated pp-value is less than the alpha level of .05.05.

0

1

Updated 2026-05-26

Contributors are:

Who are from:

Tags

KPU

Research Methods in Psychology - 4th American Edition @ KPU

Related