When the calculation of physical potential energy is used as an example, what key aspect of psychological measurement is it illustrating?

In the example of measuring potential energy, the physical process illustrates how all scientific measurement follows a systematic path. Match each part of the physics example to its role in the systematic measurement process.

A student is analyzing the logic behind the calculation of potential energy ($m imes g imes h$) to understand the systematic nature of scientific measurement. Arrange the components of this process in the correct logical sequence to demonstrate how a researcher moves from identifying physical properties to producing a final numerical score.

A critic argues that the potential energy calculation (multiplying mass, height, and gravity) fails as an example of scientific measurement because the resulting score is a 'constructed' value rather than a 'natural' one; this critique is logically flawed because scientific measurement is fundamentally defined by the systematic application of rules to assign scores to represent properties.

Imagine you are tasked with creating a new measurement protocol for the psychological construct 'Stress Resilience'. To follow the systematic approach illustrated by the calculation of potential energy, which of the following represents the most appropriate creation of a measurement rule to assign a numerical score?

The calculation of physical potential energy is used as an example to show that psychological measurement and the physical sciences share a systematic approach to assigning scores.

A researcher applies the systematic approach to measurement by calculating the potential energy of a 4 kg object positioned 5 meters above the ground. Given Earth's gravitational acceleration of $9.8 \text{ m/s}^2$, the numerical score representing this object's potential energy is _____.