Learn Before
A historical researcher from the early 20th century observes that a population group subjected to systemic educational and economic disadvantages scores lower, on average, on a newly designed "intelligence" test compared to the dominant population group. The researcher concludes that this score difference proves the inherent intellectual inferiority of the disadvantaged group. What is the most critical and flawed assumption underlying the researcher's conclusion?
0
1
Tags
Psychology
Social Science
Empirical Science
Science
Introduction to Psychology @ OpenStax Course
OpenStax
OpenStax Psychology (2nd ed.) Textbook
Analysis in Bloom's Taxonomy
Cognitive Psychology
Related
Born that way? āScientificā racism is creeping back into our thinking. Hereās what to watch out for.
Arthur Jensen's Two-Level Theory of Intelligence
Psychological Assertions of Racial Differences in IQ
Larry P. v. Riles Court Case
Critique of an Early Intelligence Study
A historical researcher from the early 20th century observes that a population group subjected to systemic educational and economic disadvantages scores lower, on average, on a newly designed "intelligence" test compared to the dominant population group. The researcher concludes that this score difference proves the inherent intellectual inferiority of the disadvantaged group. What is the most critical and flawed assumption underlying the researcher's conclusion?