A local artisan creates unique, handcrafted coffee mugs. Each mug sells for $30, but the clay, glaze, and energy to make one additional mug cost only $5. Why does this pricing strategy result in a market outcome that is not considered fully efficient?
0
1
Tags
Economics
Economy
Introduction to Microeconomics Course
CORE Econ
Social Science
Empirical Science
Science
Analysis in Bloom's Taxonomy
Cognitive Psychology
Psychology
Related
Evaluating Biodiversity Strategies
A pharmaceutical company develops a new, patented drug and sells it for $100 per dose, even though the cost to manufacture one additional dose is only $5. In a different market, a generic salt producer sells a bag of salt for $1, which is equal to the cost of producing one additional bag. How does the economic 'signal' sent by the drug's price differ from the signal sent by the salt's price?
A software company sells access to its platform for $50 per user, while the cost of adding an additional user is virtually zero. Which of the following statements best analyzes the economic signal sent by this price?
Analyzing Price Signals for Digital Goods
Analyzing Price Signals for Digital Goods
A local artisan creates unique, handcrafted coffee mugs. Each mug sells for $30, but the clay, glaze, and energy to make one additional mug cost only $5. Why does this pricing strategy result in a market outcome that is not considered fully efficient?
A concert promoter sells tickets for $80, even though the cost of admitting one more person into the half-empty venue is negligible. This pricing strategy sends an accurate signal to the market about the high value society places on this entertainment.
A consumer is willing to pay up to $12 for a monthly subscription to a movie streaming service. The service charges $18 per month, although the cost for the company to provide the service to one additional subscriber is essentially zero. Which statement best analyzes the economic outcome of this situation?
The Flawed Message of High Prices
A firm producing a specialized gadget sets its price at $50 per unit, although the cost to produce one additional unit is only $10. From the perspective of efficient resource allocation, what is the primary flaw in the economic 'signal' that the $50 price sends to the market?