Short Answer

A research group studying reaction times finds a valid extreme outlier (a participant who is unusually slow but verified as accurate). They run their hypothesis test first with the outlier (p=.02p = .02) and then without it (p=.15p = .15). Based on best practices for data reporting, what specific action should the researchers take in their final report, and why?

Question: A research group studying reaction times finds a valid extreme outlier (a participant who is unusually slow but verified as accurate). They run their hypothesis test first with the outlier (p=.02p = .02) and then without it (p=.15p = .15). Based on best practices for data reporting, what specific action should the researchers take in their final report, and why?

Sample answer: The researchers must report both sets of results (the analysis with the outlier and the analysis without the outlier) and thoroughly discuss the discrepancies. This action is required because the statistical conclusions differ substantially, shifting from a statistically significant effect (p=.02p = .02) to a non-significant one (p=.15p = .15).

Key points:

  • Apply the rule to report both sets of results (with and without the outlier).
  • State the requirement to thoroughly discuss the discrepancies between the two analyses.
  • Justify the action by pointing out that the results differ substantially (p=.02p = .02 vs. p=.15p = .15).

Rubric: The response must apply best practices to the scenario by: 1) Stating that both analyses (with and without the outlier) must be reported. 2) Stating that the discrepancies between the analyses must be discussed. 3) Justifying this because the results differ substantially (shifting between p=.02p = .02 and p=.15p = .15).

0

1

Updated 2026-05-27

Contributors are:

Who are from:

Tags

KPU

Research Methods in Psychology - 4th American Edition @ KPU

Related