Learn Before
A researcher designs a new scale to measure Agreeableness but only includes items that assess 'altruism', 'modesty', and 'compliance'. Analyze the construct validity of this scale. Which specific facets of Agreeableness are missing, and what is the methodological consequence of omitting them?
Question: A researcher designs a new scale to measure Agreeableness but only includes items that assess 'altruism', 'modesty', and 'compliance'. Analyze the construct validity of this scale. Which specific facets of Agreeableness are missing, and what is the methodological consequence of omitting them?
Sample answer: The scale has poor construct validity because it suffers from construct underrepresentation. It only measures three of the six facets of Agreeableness. The missing facets are trust, straight-forwardness, and tender mindedness. Omitting these facets means the scale fails to measure the full scope of the Agreeableness construct, leading to incomplete and potentially invalid conclusions.
Key points:
- Identify that the scale's construct validity is compromised by omitting key facets.
- Identify the missing facets as trust, straight-forwardness, and tender mindedness.
- Explain that the omission leads to construct underrepresentation or incomplete measurement.
Rubric: The response must identify that the scale lacks complete construct validity due to missing facets. It must list the three missing facets: trust, straight-forwardness, and tender mindedness, and state that the consequence is construct underrepresentation or an incomplete measurement of Agreeableness.
0
1
Tags
KPU
Research Methods in Psychology - 4th American Edition @ KPU
Related
Impact of Agreeableness and Conscientiousness on Student Learning Choices
Agreeableness and Facebook Use
Workplace Team Dynamics
A team is working on a group project, and a disagreement arises about the best approach to take. Which of the following team members is demonstrating a high level of agreeableness?
Which of the following is NOT one of the six facets of agreeableness as defined in the Big Five personality model?
According to the Big Five personality model, a person who scores low in agreeableness would typically be described as trusting and cooperative with others.
A research team is coding personality-related behaviors observed during a study. Match each observed behavior to the agreeableness facet it best illustrates.
A researcher observes a participant who consistently refrains from boasting, readily admits personal limitations, and avoids claiming superiority over peers. Based on the six facets of agreeableness in the Big Five personality model, these behaviors most directly operationalize the _____ facet.
A researcher wants to evaluate whether a newly developed agreeableness scale adequately measures the construct as defined in the Big Five model. Place the following steps in the most methodologically sound order.
According to the Big Five personality model, which combination of characteristics best describes a person who scores HIGH in agreeableness?
Explain how a researcher would conceptualize the Big Five dimension of Agreeableness to design a self-report personality questionnaire. In your explanation, describe the differences in behaviors between individuals who score high versus low on this dimension, and list the six specific facets that the scale must measure to represent the construct comprehensively.
Based on the behaviors described in the case, diagnose the agreeableness levels (high vs. low) of User A and User B. Justify your diagnoses by mapping their specific observed behaviors to the traits and facets of Agreeableness defined in the Big Five model.
A researcher designs a new scale to measure Agreeableness but only includes items that assess 'altruism', 'modesty', and 'compliance'. Analyze the construct validity of this scale. Which specific facets of Agreeableness are missing, and what is the methodological consequence of omitting them?