Learn Before
Short Answer

A researcher implements a new reading intervention for a student using a reversal design. After the intervention is removed, the student's reading comprehension scores remain high. Apply the concepts of reversal design limitations to explain why this result prevents the researcher from claiming the intervention caused the improvement.

Question: A researcher implements a new reading intervention for a student using a reversal design. After the intervention is removed, the student's reading comprehension scores remain high. Apply the concepts of reversal design limitations to explain why this result prevents the researcher from claiming the intervention caused the improvement.

Sample answer: Because the student's reading comprehension scores did not return to baseline after the intervention was removed, the researcher cannot establish a clear causal relationship. The persistence of high scores makes it unclear whether the reading intervention caused the improvement or if another factor, such as external tutoring or natural learning, was responsible.

Key points:

  • The dependent variable (reading comprehension) did not return to baseline after treatment removal.
  • The failure to return to baseline makes it impossible to determine if the treatment caused the change.
  • Alternative explanations or other factors cannot be ruled out.

Rubric: The response must apply the concept of failure to return to baseline to explain the loss of internal validity. It must state that without a return to baseline, the researcher cannot distinguish the effects of the treatment from external factors.

0

1

Updated 2026-05-27

Contributors are:

Who are from:

Tags

KPU

Research Methods in Psychology - 4th American Edition @ KPU

Related