Learn Before
A researcher is designing an experiment to test competing theories of self-judgment, specifically focusing on how students evaluate their own assertiveness. How could the researcher operationally define the independent variable in a way that allows them to test the fundamental mechanism of the number-of-examples theory?
Question: A researcher is designing an experiment to test competing theories of self-judgment, specifically focusing on how students evaluate their own assertiveness. How could the researcher operationally define the independent variable in a way that allows them to test the fundamental mechanism of the number-of-examples theory?
Sample answer: The researcher could operationally define the independent variable by manipulating the required quantity of assertiveness examples participants must list, such as randomly assigning one group to recall 3 examples and another group to recall 12 examples.
Key points:
- The operational definition must involve an active manipulation of the independent variable.
- The manipulation must focus on the quantity or number of examples recalled by the participants.
Rubric: Credit is awarded for identifying that the independent variable must involve manipulating the specific quantity or number of examples participants are asked to recall.
0
1
Tags
KPU
Research Methods in Psychology - 4th American Edition @ KPU
Related
Example of Testing Competing Theories: Self-Judgment
According to the number-of-examples theory, what do people base their self-evaluations on when judging their own traits?
According to the number-of-examples theory, a research participant who successfully recalls ten instances of being brave will rate themselves as more courageous than a participant who recalls only three, even if retrieving the ten examples was mentally difficult.
In a social psychology study on self-perception, participants are asked to recall specific times they demonstrated 'leadership.' According to the Number-of-examples theory, rank the following participants from the one who will perceive themselves as the strongest leader (1) to the one who will perceive themselves as the weakest leader (4).
Match each component of a research study to its specific theoretical role according to the Number-of-examples theory.
A researcher designs an experiment to test the number-of-examples theory regarding how individuals evaluate their own personality traits. Which of the following experimental results would provide the strongest evidence in support of this theory?
According to the number-of-examples theory, people judge their own personality traits based on the sheer _____ of relevant instances they can bring to mind.
In a study on self-judgment, participants recalled either 3 or 12 instances of their own helpfulness. If those who struggled to list 12 examples rated themselves as less helpful than those who easily listed 3, this result would _____ the Number-of-Examples theory.
A researcher designs a study where Group A recalls 12 examples of assertive behavior (a difficult task) and Group B recalls 3 examples (an easy task). If the number-of-examples theory is correct, participants in Group A will rate themselves as more assertive than those in Group B.
Match each research concept to its role in an experiment comparing the number-of-examples theory and the ease-of-retrieval theory.
A researcher is evaluating whether the number-of-examples theory or the ease-of-retrieval theory better explains self-judgment. Order the steps of this research evaluation process from start to finish.
State what the number-of-examples theory proposes about how individuals make self-judgments, and identify the competing psychological model it is typically contrasted with.
Based strictly on the principles of the number-of-examples theory, what specific outcome should the researcher expect regarding the self-evaluations of the two groups, and what is the theoretical justification for this expectation?
A researcher is designing an experiment to test competing theories of self-judgment, specifically focusing on how students evaluate their own assertiveness. How could the researcher operationally define the independent variable in a way that allows them to test the fundamental mechanism of the number-of-examples theory?