Short Answer

A researcher studying a new reading program for children finds a sample difference in reading comprehension scores. When she determines the probability of obtaining this difference under the assumption that the reading program has no effect in the population, she finds that this result is extremely unlikely. Applying the general logic of null hypothesis testing, what decision should she make regarding the null hypothesis, and what is the resulting interpretation of her reading program?

Question: A researcher studying a new reading program for children finds a sample difference in reading comprehension scores. When she determines the probability of obtaining this difference under the assumption that the reading program has no effect in the population, she finds that this result is extremely unlikely. Applying the general logic of null hypothesis testing, what decision should she make regarding the null hypothesis, and what is the resulting interpretation of her reading program?

Sample answer: The researcher should reject the null hypothesis in favor of the alternative hypothesis. This decision implies that the reading program does have a relationship/effect in the population, since the sample result was extremely unlikely to occur under the assumption of no relationship.

Key points:

  • Reject the null hypothesis.
  • Favor the alternative hypothesis.
  • Conclude that there is a relationship in the population (the reading program has an effect).

Rubric: Grading Rubric: - States the decision to reject the null hypothesis. - Explains that this decision favors the alternative hypothesis, indicating there is a relationship/effect in the population.

0

1

Updated 2026-05-27

Contributors are:

Who are from:

Tags

KPU

Research Methods in Psychology - 4th American Edition @ KPU

Related