Learn Before
Multiple Choice

A researcher submits a study using a switching replication design to evaluate a new cognitive therapy. In the discussion section, the researcher asserts, 'Because the delayed rollout confirmed the effectiveness of the therapy in both samples and ruled out confounding variables like coincident campus events and natural psychological development, we can definitively conclude that the therapy itself—rather than participant expectations—caused the improvement.' As a peer reviewer, how should you evaluate this assertion?

0

1

Updated 2026-06-07

Contributors are:

Who are from:

Tags

KPU

Research Methods in Psychology - 4th American Edition @ KPU

Related