Learn Before
A student is researching the effects of video games on adolescent aggression. They find one peer-reviewed study concluding that playing violent video games significantly increases aggressive behavior. However, they find another equally credible peer-reviewed study that reports no significant link between the two. What does this situation best illustrate about the nature of scientific inquiry in a complex field?
0
1
Tags
Ch.2 Psychological Research - Psychology @ OpenStax
Psychology @ OpenStax
Introduction to Psychology @ OpenStax Course
OpenStax
OpenStax Psychology (2nd ed.) Textbook
Psychology
Social Science
Empirical Science
Science
Analysis in Bloom's Taxonomy
Cognitive Psychology
Related
Process of Reaching Scientific Consensus
Example of Contradictory Findings: Technology's Impact on Students
A student is researching the effect of mindfulness meditation on stress levels in college students. They find one peer-reviewed study concluding that daily meditation significantly reduces reported stress. However, they then find another equally credible peer-reviewed study that reports no significant difference in stress levels between students who meditate and those who do not. Faced with these two different outcomes, what is the most appropriate interpretation of the research on this topic?
A student is researching the effects of video games on adolescent aggression. They find one peer-reviewed study concluding that playing violent video games significantly increases aggressive behavior. However, they find another equally credible peer-reviewed study that reports no significant link between the two. What does this situation best illustrate about the nature of scientific inquiry in a complex field?